1976
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197602000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Cephalometric Analysis of Mandibular Bone Absorption Under Silicone Rubber Chin Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
3

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Silicone or ceramics are used widely (Feuerstein, 1978;Flowers, 1991;Karras and Wolford, 1998) and the surgical approaches are either transoral or transcutaneous (Allcroft et al, 1994). Complications arising after implantation of alloplasts are as common as with other techniques for genioplasty (Friedland et al, 1976;Matarasso et al, 1996;Zide, 1999). Atypical cyst formation following chin augmentation 109 Genioplasty incorporates specific side effects that have been reported to have a frequency between 0% and 2%: dislocation, infection, neurosensory disturbances or resorption are noted independently of the surgical method and approach or the material used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Silicone or ceramics are used widely (Feuerstein, 1978;Flowers, 1991;Karras and Wolford, 1998) and the surgical approaches are either transoral or transcutaneous (Allcroft et al, 1994). Complications arising after implantation of alloplasts are as common as with other techniques for genioplasty (Friedland et al, 1976;Matarasso et al, 1996;Zide, 1999). Atypical cyst formation following chin augmentation 109 Genioplasty incorporates specific side effects that have been reported to have a frequency between 0% and 2%: dislocation, infection, neurosensory disturbances or resorption are noted independently of the surgical method and approach or the material used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various procedures to augment the chin, such as using alloplastic implants (Friedland et al, 1976;Feuerstein, 1978;Flowers, 1991;Harada et al, 1993;Gubisch and Kotzur, 1998), chin osteotomies and grafting techniques with costal bone or nasal cartilage grafts (Hofer, 1942;Trauner and Obwegeser, 1957;Koele, 1961;Safian, 1966;Adams, 1987;Davis, 1983;Stambaugh, 1992;Allcroft et al, 1994;Bujia, 1994;Glasgold and Glasgold, 1994;Converse, 1950;Karacaoglan et al, 1998;Karras and Wolford, 1998;Choe, 2000;Mottura, 2002). The use of the nasal hump and septal cartilage has already been described by Aufricht (1934Aufricht ( , 1958.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto se logra añadiendo las técnicas desarrolladas para realzar la cara en el eje anterior-posterior. Los métodos usados para crear este rejuvenecimiento volumétrico o tridimensional incluyen: el aumento de las capas grasas subcutáneas (12), la imbricación de tejidos blandos faciales, la reposición de las almohadillas grasas como colgajos pediculados (10) y/o el aumento del esqueleto óseo con implantes aloplásticos (13)(14)(15) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Rejuvenecimiento Facial En "Doble Sigma": Un Concepto Voluméunclassified
“…Sin embargo, su superficie lisa no permite el crecimiento vascular o tisular a su través, siendo característica de estos implantes la formación de cápsula de tejido fibroso. La morbilidad asociada con los implantes del silicona incluye, infección, extrusión, desplazamiento, así como erosión ósea (13). Cuando es necesaria la retirada de un implante encapsulado de silicona, su explantación es menos laboriosa.…”
Section: Implantes Aloplásticosunclassified
“…This statement is based on the authors' personal observations of 115 patients having osteotomies, 75 operated on in the last 3 years and the remainder in a 12-year span prior to that.36 During this 15-year span, onlay grafts of rib cartilage, bone from the ribs, iliac bone grafts, cranial bone grafts, Silastic prostheses, and Proplast were also used. Both forms of synthetic material were associated with the widely known chin erosion phen~menon.~' 40 The pressure of the mentalis muscle is probably largely responsible for the erosion and differs anatomically from the malar-midface area where no erosion of bone has been observed. Bone grafts on the chin absorbed in unpredictable amounts, while cartilage remained largely intact but tended to warp \\.it11 tinlc.…”
Section: Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%