2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40902-016-0089-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective clinical study of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface and internal connection: analysis of short-term success rate and marginal bone loss

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical utility of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and internal connection.MethodsSix patients who received dental implants in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chonnam National University Dental Hospital, were analyzed by factors influencing the success rate and marginal bone loss. Factors included patient’s age, sex, implant installation site, whether bone graft was done, type of bone g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality and the quantity of bone surrounding the implant is considered to be one of the essential factors that influences the long-term success of implant treatment and is the decisive factor in the morphology, quality, and the esthetics of the soft tissue sealing the implant-supported restoration [17]. The evaluation of MBL after a period of more than 1 year after functional loading should be one of the indicators to predict the long-term success of the implant because the majority of implant failures occurs within this period of time [27]. In our study, the mean MBL at 3 months following implant placement was 0.25 ± 0.71 on the mesial side and 0.15 ± 0.69 on the distal side of the implant system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality and the quantity of bone surrounding the implant is considered to be one of the essential factors that influences the long-term success of implant treatment and is the decisive factor in the morphology, quality, and the esthetics of the soft tissue sealing the implant-supported restoration [17]. The evaluation of MBL after a period of more than 1 year after functional loading should be one of the indicators to predict the long-term success of the implant because the majority of implant failures occurs within this period of time [27]. In our study, the mean MBL at 3 months following implant placement was 0.25 ± 0.71 on the mesial side and 0.15 ± 0.69 on the distal side of the implant system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, some but not all CIs allowed bony ingrowth into the porous structures. To allow for bony ingrowth, initial stability of the CI must be achieved immediately following CI fixation, which is similar to the case of dental implant osseointegration32. Intermaxillary fixation could be an additional procedure performed during the initial stage of recovery to enhance the stability of CI by avoiding masticatory movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short-term, the survival rate of SLA, HA coating, and oxidized surface modifications was reported to be 100%, but the survival rate tended to be slightly lower in the long-term [ 9 11 ]. The long-term survival rate of each surface modification is shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%