2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Comparison of Patients ≥ 80 Years With Atrial Fibrillation Prescribed Either an FDA-Approved Reduced or Full Dose Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the very elderly aged ≥85 years, OAC use shows a net antithrombotic benefit over bleeding risk, as reported by O et al [3] , so that OAC should not be withheld in these vulnerable patients. Similar conclusions were reached by Taoutel et al [4] , who retrospectively examined a cohort of AF patients aged ≥80 years prescribed either full-dose or approved reduced-dose DOAC, and confirm effective TE risk reduction with a low rate of cerebral bleeds independent of dose. Guideline-conform OAC therapy, including on-label reduced DOAC dosing, is not linked with increased silent cerebral infarction, as detailed by Kim et al [5] .…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Even in the very elderly aged ≥85 years, OAC use shows a net antithrombotic benefit over bleeding risk, as reported by O et al [3] , so that OAC should not be withheld in these vulnerable patients. Similar conclusions were reached by Taoutel et al [4] , who retrospectively examined a cohort of AF patients aged ≥80 years prescribed either full-dose or approved reduced-dose DOAC, and confirm effective TE risk reduction with a low rate of cerebral bleeds independent of dose. Guideline-conform OAC therapy, including on-label reduced DOAC dosing, is not linked with increased silent cerebral infarction, as detailed by Kim et al [5] .…”
supporting
confidence: 81%