EPR in the 21st Century 2002
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450973-4/50104-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective EPR‐dosimetry in Semipalatinsk nuclear test site region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several EPR tooth enamel retrospective dose assessments have been conducted to assess acute and chronic radiation exposures: (1) the atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Ikeya et al 1984;Nakamura et al 1998;Young and Kerr 2005;Tatsumi-Miyajima and Okajima 1991); (2) Chernobyl accident (Chumak et al 1999(Chumak et al , 1996Ishii et al 1990;Chumak et al 1998;Gualtieri et al 2001); (3) Techa River (Shishkina et al 2016;Degteva et al 2015); (4) Semipalatinsk nuclear test site (Ivannikov et al 2002;Pivovarov et al 2002;Zhumadilov et al 2007Zhumadilov et al , 2013; (5) the nuclear weapons test sites in the former Soviet Union (Dolon and Bodene) (Zhumadilov et al 2006); and (6) Russian nuclear workers (Romanyukha et al 2000(Romanyukha et al , 1994. In all these studies, human tooth enamel was used successfully to estimate acute and chronic exposures (i.e., doses received by populations due to several accidents and occupational exposures) in individuals, groups, or populations.…”
Section: Retrospective and Accident Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several EPR tooth enamel retrospective dose assessments have been conducted to assess acute and chronic radiation exposures: (1) the atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Ikeya et al 1984;Nakamura et al 1998;Young and Kerr 2005;Tatsumi-Miyajima and Okajima 1991); (2) Chernobyl accident (Chumak et al 1999(Chumak et al , 1996Ishii et al 1990;Chumak et al 1998;Gualtieri et al 2001); (3) Techa River (Shishkina et al 2016;Degteva et al 2015); (4) Semipalatinsk nuclear test site (Ivannikov et al 2002;Pivovarov et al 2002;Zhumadilov et al 2007Zhumadilov et al , 2013; (5) the nuclear weapons test sites in the former Soviet Union (Dolon and Bodene) (Zhumadilov et al 2006); and (6) Russian nuclear workers (Romanyukha et al 2000(Romanyukha et al , 1994. In all these studies, human tooth enamel was used successfully to estimate acute and chronic exposures (i.e., doses received by populations due to several accidents and occupational exposures) in individuals, groups, or populations.…”
Section: Retrospective and Accident Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPR tooth dosimetry research started to grow rapidly after the Chernobyl accident in 1986 (Aldrich and Pass, 1988, Shimano et al, 1989and Ikeya and Ishii, 1989, which resulted in maturation of the EPR technique with tooth enamel. The technique has been verified through several intercomparisons (Chumak et al, 1996, Wieser et al, 2000a and was applied for dose reconstruction of A-bomb victims (Ikeya et al, 1984 andNakamura et al, 1998), Chernobyl liquidators , the population in territories contaminated due to the Chernobyl accident (Skvortzov et al, 1995, Skvortzov et al, 2000, Ivannikov et al, 1997, Ivannikov et al, 2004band Ivannikov et al, 2014, residents near the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS, Kazakhstan) , Zhumadilov et al, 2009, Zhumadilov et al, 2011a, Zhumadilov et al, 2011b, Zhumadilov et al, 2013Ivannikov et al, 2002, Pivovarov et al, 2002and Sholom et al, 2007a, and the inhabitants of the Techa River basin affected by the operation of the Mayak Production Association , Degteva et al, 2005, Degteva et al, 2015.…”
Section: Retrospective Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%