2007
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2007.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective study of monoclonal gammopathies detected in the clinical laboratory of a Spanish healthcare district: 14-year series

Abstract: We conclude that the clinical laboratory should play an important role in the study of monoclonal gammopathies, since it is the only location where all M-protein patients are observed. On the other hand, studies of this type should be carried out over long-term periods, owing to the variations we have noted in the detection of M-proteins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These two reports illustrate the difficulty in generalizing across studies that use different methodologies or case definitions: the Swedish study was based on IEP rather than IFE for identification of IgM, and the Dutch study employed a restricted definition of MGUS compared with many other reports. On the basis of a limited number of reports, IgM MGUS appears to be substantially less frequent in Eastern Europe (38), Greece (39), and Israel (29) and intermediate in southern European countries such as Spain (41) and Italy (37). Geographical variation also appears within populations of western European descent (42, 44, 47).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Igm Mgus In Various Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two reports illustrate the difficulty in generalizing across studies that use different methodologies or case definitions: the Swedish study was based on IEP rather than IFE for identification of IgM, and the Dutch study employed a restricted definition of MGUS compared with many other reports. On the basis of a limited number of reports, IgM MGUS appears to be substantially less frequent in Eastern Europe (38), Greece (39), and Israel (29) and intermediate in southern European countries such as Spain (41) and Italy (37). Geographical variation also appears within populations of western European descent (42, 44, 47).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Igm Mgus In Various Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximate 100:1 ratio in the population generally corresponds to Brought to you by | University of Queensland -UQ Library Authenticated Download Date | 6/23/16 2:26 AM the reported progression rate of MGUS to myeloma and related conditions. However, reports on the disease spectrum seen at healthcare institutions indicate that MGUS contributes between 51% and 54%, the myeloma group of diseases 25%-33% and light chain amyloidosis 1%-11% of the monoclonal gammopathy caseload [5,10]. This 1.6-2: 1 ratio of MGUS to myeloma is in contrast to that suggested by the population prevalences and probably reflects the effect of targeted investigations based on clinical presentation on yield, as opposed to indiscriminate population based screening.…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These two reports illustrate the difficulty in generalizing across studies that use different methodologies or case definitions: the Swedish study was based on IEP rather than IFE for identification of IgM, and the Dutch study employed a restricted definition of MGUS compared with many other reports. On the basis of a limited number of reports, IgM MGUS appears to be substantially less frequent in Eastern Europe (38), Greece (39), and Israel (29) and intermediate in southern European countries such as Spain (41) and Italy (37). Geographical variation also appears within populations of western European descent (42,44,47).…”
Section: S93mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several early studies were large surveys in clinically defined populations, such as blood donors (42,44,46) that were pivotal in identifying the subgroup of monoclonal gammopathy that was ultimately designated MGUS. Most are series based on patients referred to tertiary care centers for electrophoretic studies during a diagnostic evaluation because of a known or suspected M-protein (29,30,39,41). Others evaluate defined population of interest, such as atomic bomb survivors (27) or elderly residents in a retirement home (31,34).…”
Section: S93mentioning
confidence: 99%