Retrospective Study of Survival Rates According to the Type of Dental Restoration of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars

the aim was to determine the survival of tooth-coloured restorative materials in proximal restorations of primary teeth at 24 months of follow-up and the influence of the following variables: use of coating, use of cavity conditioner, use of rubber dam isolation, the cavity form, the dentist's experience and the methodological characteristics of the studies. We conducted a search until May 2019, obtaining 16 articles from which 30 independent studies were extracted, which were considered as units of analysis. Four outcome measures were extracted from each study: retention, marginal integrity, anatomic form, and absence of recurrent caries. Separate meta-analyses were carried for each outcome and multiple meta-regression model was applied. The outcomes with the highest mean success rates were absence of recurrent caries and anatomic form. The type of material significantly influenced success rates. The best materials were resin-based material plus total-etching adhesion and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and the worst high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC). Atraumatic restorative treatment (ARt) had a lower success rate than the conventional cavity form. RMGic had the best clinical performance and HVGIC the worst. The form of the cavity, blinding and the experience of the operator were the variables that influenced success rates. Proximal primary molar restorations should be performed with RMGIC as it combines good mechanical performance of the resins together with the prevention of secondary caries of glass ionomers. The Global Burden of Disease 2015 study 1 concluded that oral health has not improved in the last 25 years: the age-standardized prevalence rate of untreated caries in primary teeth was 7.8% (573 million children) and 126 million children worldwide had incident cases of caries in primary teeth in 2015. Dental caries, according to the WHO, remains the most frequent chronic disease in early childhood in most communities around the world, having a negative impact on the quality of life of both the child and their family, and is considered a public health problem 2,3. The toxic effects on the patient, health professionals and the environment, the increasing prevalence of minimal intervention restorative approaches and the increased demand for aesthetics, have reduced the use of amalgam as the material of choice for the restoration of primary teeth 4,5. Currently, restorative treatments for primary teeth include a wide variety of tooth-coloured materials such as glass ionomer cements (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC), compomers and composite resins (CR). In general, composites are recommended in children with a low risk of caries, compomers in children with a moderate risk and glass ionomers in children with a high risk 6. GICs are good materials for the primary dentition 7 due to their ability to adhere to the dental structure, low polymerization contraction, lack of postoperative sensitivity, biological compatibility and th...

show abstract

“…• Language other than English, Spanish, Portuguese: 1. (Summary in English, full article in Korean) 64 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis

Ruiz¹,

Pérez-Guzmán²,

Rubio‐Aparicio³

et al. 2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…하여 탈회된 법랑질의 재광화, 우식 유발 미생물의 효소 작용 억 제, 치아의 탈회 저항성 증가 등의 우식 예방 효과를 보여, 2차우 식의 발생이 수복 실패의 주된 원인인 소아 환자의 수복치료에 유리하다 [1][2][3][4]. 불소함유 수복재의 종류로는 글라스아이오노머, 레진강화형 글라스아이오노머, alkasite 수복재 등이 있다.…”

Section: ⅰ 서 론 불소함유 수복재는 지속적으로 수복물 주변으로 불소를 방출unclassified

Fluoride Release of Several Types of Fluoride-Containing Restorative Materials According to Fluoride Concentration in Toothpaste

Lee¹,

Lee²,

Ra³

2022

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted to investigate the fluoride release of fluoride-containing restorative materials in fluoride recharging according to the concentration of fluoride toothpaste used in Korea. Samples of glass ionomer cement, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, alkasite restorative material, and composite resin were prepared and fluoride release was measured on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28. Thereafter, fluoride-free, 500 ppm, and 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste was applied to each restorative materials, and the fluoride release was measured on days 1, 3, 7. Glass ionomer cement showed the highest cumulative fluoride release until the 7th day of measurement, and from the 14th day onwards, the resin-modified glass ionomer cement showed the highest cumulative fluoride release, but there was no significant difference. When restorative material groups were recharged with 500 ppm of fluoride toothpaste, the fluoride release was significantly higher only for the alkasite restorative material compared to the fluoride-free toothpaste group (p < 0.017). When restorative material groups were recharged with 1450 ppm of fluoride toothpaste, the fluoride release was significantly higher in all restorative groups compared to the fluoride-free toothpaste group (p < 0.017).

show abstract

Comparison of Partial Pulpotomy in Permanent Molars Using Different Pulp Capping Agents and Restoration Materials

Mi¹,

Young²,

Lee³

et al. 2020

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of two pulp capping materials, BiodentineTM and RetroMTA®, used for partial pulpotomy in permanent molars after carious exposures and to compare the final restorative outcome of using composite resin to that of using a stainless steel crown. We studied children who were diagnosed with dental caries of permanent molars and underwent partial pulpotomy. The patients were followed up for more than 1 year. Clinical and radiographic evaluation were used to evaluate the success of each treatment. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the outcomes of two groups. For pulp capping agents, the success rate of using RetroMTA® was lower than that of using BiodentineTM(p < 0.05). Final restoration with composite resin was less successful than restoration with an stainless steel crown(p < 0.05). In combination of pulp capping agents and final restoration material, RetroMTA®- composite resin shows the lowest success rate(p < 0.05).

show abstract

Retrospective Study of Survival Rates According to the Type of Dental Restoration of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars

Cited by 5 publications

References 15 publications

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis

Fluoride Release of Several Types of Fluoride-Containing Restorative Materials According to Fluoride Concentration in Toothpaste

Comparison of Partial Pulpotomy in Permanent Molars Using Different Pulp Capping Agents and Restoration Materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About