Retrospectives: Cost-Push and Demand-Pull Inflation: Milton Friedman and the “Cruel Dilemma”

Abstract

This paper addresses two conflicting views in the 1950s and 1960s about the inflation-unemployment tradeoff as given by the Phillips curve. Many economists at this time emphasized the issue of a seemingly unavoidable inflationary pressure at or even below full employment. In contrast, Milton Friedman was convinced that full employment and price stability are not conflicting policy objectives. This dividing line between the two camps ultimately rested on fundamentally different views about the inflationary process: For economists of the 1950s and 1960s cost-push forces are responsible for the apparent conflict between price stability and full employment. On the other hand, Friedman, who regarded inflation to be an exclusively monetary phenomenon, rejected the notion of ongoing inflationary cost-push pressures at full employment. Besides his emphasis on the full adjustment of inflation expectations, this rejection of cost-push theories of inflation, which implied a decoupling of the two previously perceived incompatible policy objectives, was the other important element in Friedman's attack on the Phillips curve tradeoff in his 1967 presidential address to the American Economic Association.

Potential Output in Theory and Practice: A Revision and Update of Okun's Original Method

“…Consistently with its target nature, it is fixed exogenously, at a politically chosen arbitrary level. The precise number is set by Okun at 4 percent, and reflects an unemployment level that at the time was considered greater than the measure of 'true' full employment (then regarded in the vicinity of 3 percent, see Bronfenbrenner and Holzman 1963;Schwarzer 2018) by a sufficient margin to check for excessive inflationary pressures. Another reason in favor of such a number is the fact that a 4 percent unemployment rate was actually observable at a point of time in the estimation interval considered by Okun 34 , which allowed him to reconstruct the series of potential output starting from a known output level.…”

Is the Fiscal Deficit of ASEAN Alarming? Evidence from Fiscal Deficit Consequences and Contribution towards Sustainable Economic Growth

“…This price increase is from the supply side. The second way is from the demand side when the central bank increases the money supply to fill the gap in fiscal deficit [10]. The government authorities can utilize ways and means to finance the fiscal deficit, such as outstanding debt and printing new money.…”

Assessment of the Impact of Hard Commodity Prices Changes on Inflation in European Union Countries

“…As inflation is often accompanied by several economic and social problems such as relative price shifts or a transfer of wealth from lenders to borrowers, defending price stability is a common main goal of economic and social politics (Verheyen, 2010). Cogoljevic, Gavrilovic, Roganovic, Matic, and Piljana (2018) stated that inflation represents an increase in the general price level or a decrease in the value of money and the typical behaviour of inflation and inflation transmission process was analysed by Sinicakova, Sulikove, Horvath, Gazda, and Grof (2011), Schwarzer (2018) and Bouchaud, Gualdi, Tarzia, and Zamponi (2017). Additionally, Malliaris (2006) stresses that different measures of inflation exist due to the multiple ways to measure the rate of price increases.…”