2002
DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300030801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retroversion of the Humerus in the Throwing Shoulder of College Baseball Pitchers

Abstract: Rotational changes in the throwing shoulder are due to bony as well as soft tissue adaptations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
286
5
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
25
286
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bony as well as soft tissue adaptations in response to many years of playing soccer may be responsible for this increased FNA in our subjects. This may be comparable to the adaptive changes of humeral head retroversion in throwing athletes observed over time [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Bony as well as soft tissue adaptations in response to many years of playing soccer may be responsible for this increased FNA in our subjects. This may be comparable to the adaptive changes of humeral head retroversion in throwing athletes observed over time [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[2][3][4][5]10,23,28,30,34 In addition to the ROM differences seen in pitchers, Brown et al 5 also reported increased shoulder external rotation and decreased internal rotation in the throwing arm, compared to the nonthrowing arm, of position players at the major league level. More recently, Reagan et al 34 have shown similar changes in glenohumeral joint ROM in position players at the collegiate level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent variable was the presence of GIRD (15°o r greater) or absence of appreciable GIRD (14°or less). These cutoffs were chosen based on humeral retroversion studies, which show an average increase of retroversion of 15° [32,35]. The dependent variables were dominant and nondominant scapular upward rotation (measured at rest, 60°, 90°, and 120°glenohumeral abduction) and dominant and nondominant scapular protraction (measured at rest, with hands on hips, and 90°glenohumeral abduction).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thought that a thicker posterior capsule would have increased structural stiffness, thereby limiting internal rotation [5,6,31,39]. Finally, others believe both are caused by an increase of humeral retroversion [8,32,33,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%