2003
DOI: 10.1023/b:urol.0000022913.96740.e8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrovesical migration of malpositioned double-j ureteral stent

Abstract: A case of extraperitoneal migration of a double-J ureteral stent in the retrovesical space as a result of malposition is being described. The management of this very rare complication of stent placement, which has never been reported in the international literature, is presented in detail.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ureteral stent insertion is traditionally performed using a cystoscope guided by a fluoroscope. However, the fluoroscope is not always available[12] and so the procedure is often performed blindly. Due to the extensive use of DJ stents in urology, many complications have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ureteral stent insertion is traditionally performed using a cystoscope guided by a fluoroscope. However, the fluoroscope is not always available[12] and so the procedure is often performed blindly. Due to the extensive use of DJ stents in urology, many complications have been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If possible, this process should be performed under fluoroscopy. However, fluoroscopy is not universally available in endoscopy rooms (8), and so the procedure is often performed blind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques (including open, 7,8 laparoscopic 9 and endourologic 10 approaches) have been described, usually in isolated case reports. In this case, we opted for a percutaneous approach because it was more definitive than a retrograde ureterorenoscopic approach and it spared the patient the morbidity of an open procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%