2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10108-006-9004-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return to Dollar, Generalized Distance Function and the Fisher Productivity Index

Abstract: Exploring the duality between a return to dollar definition of profit and the generalized distance function we establish the relationship between the Laspeyres, Paasche and Fisher productivity indexes and their alternative Malmquist indexes counterparts. By proceeding this way, we propose a consistent decomposition of these productivity indexes into two mutually exclusive components. A technical component represented by the Malmquist index and an economical component which can be identified with the contributi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Zofı´o and Lovell (2001) note, the additive nature of the directional distance function and its duality to the profit function makes it more suitable -dual -for profit efficiency measurement, rather than for productivity analysis. The duality between the generalized distance function and productivity indexes as shown in Zofı´o and Prieto (2006) makes the Chavas and Cox (1999) approach more suitable for our purposes. We assume that for each period t = 1, .…”
Section: Measuring Performance In the Presence Of Undesirable Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Zofı´o and Lovell (2001) note, the additive nature of the directional distance function and its duality to the profit function makes it more suitable -dual -for profit efficiency measurement, rather than for productivity analysis. The duality between the generalized distance function and productivity indexes as shown in Zofı´o and Prieto (2006) makes the Chavas and Cox (1999) approach more suitable for our purposes. We assume that for each period t = 1, .…”
Section: Measuring Performance In the Presence Of Undesirable Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then show that it can be decomposed into a measure of economic efficiency represented by the generalized distance function introduced by Chavas and Cox (1999), and a factor defined as the geometric mean of the allocative efficiencies corresponding to the n shadow prices. Let us define maximum profitability as Zofío and Prieto (2006) proved that…”
Section: Profitability Cross-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the economic goal is different, the underlying duality that allows a consistent measurement of economic cross-efficiency is different. For example, for the revenue function, the dual representation of the technology is the output distance function (Shephard, 1953), while for the profitability function it is the generalized distance function (Zofío and Prieto, 2006). Moreover, since the generalized distance function nests the input and output distance functions as particular cases (as well as the hyperbolic distance function), we can relate the cost, revenue and profitability cross-efficiency models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Zofio and Prieto (2006) (henceforth ZP) proposed a third decomposition of the Fisher TFP index based on a generalized graph distance function by Chavas and Cox (1999), which requires specification of a weighting parameter that determines the projection path to the frontier. The ZP decomposition consists of a technical component represented by the Malmquist index and an economic component consisting of an allocative efficiency component and a residual allocative term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%