2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01672-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return to Play Prediction Accuracy of the MLG-R Classification System for Hamstring Injuries in Football Players: A Machine Learning Approach

Abstract: BackgroundMuscle injuries are one of the main daily problems in sports medicine, football in particular. However, we do not have reliable means to predict the outcome, i.e. return to play (RTP) from severe injury. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capability of the MLG-R classification system to grade hamstring muscle injuries by severity, offer a prognosis for the RTP, and identify injuries with higher risk of reinjury. And to assess the consistency of our proposed system by investigating its i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the involvement of connective tissue seems to be a risk factor for longer time loss (18.5 days for muscle, 31 days for MTJ, and 62 days for tendon). This had already been reported in athletics studies by Pollock et al 6,20 and in elite football players by Valle et al 43 and Shamji et al 7 Their findings suggest that it is not only the connective tissue involvement, but also the extent of the damage and its specific location (eg, endomysium, perimysium, and epimysium), which could be the main determinant of injury severity. Second, proximal injuries showed extended RTS compared with distal and mid-third injuries.…”
Section: Injury Characteristics Differ Between Sportsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the involvement of connective tissue seems to be a risk factor for longer time loss (18.5 days for muscle, 31 days for MTJ, and 62 days for tendon). This had already been reported in athletics studies by Pollock et al 6,20 and in elite football players by Valle et al 43 and Shamji et al 7 Their findings suggest that it is not only the connective tissue involvement, but also the extent of the damage and its specific location (eg, endomysium, perimysium, and epimysium), which could be the main determinant of injury severity. Second, proximal injuries showed extended RTS compared with distal and mid-third injuries.…”
Section: Injury Characteristics Differ Between Sportsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Second, proximal injuries showed extended RTS compared with distal and mid-third injuries. The literature is conflicting in this regard, with some studies indicating that proximal injuries are prognostic of extended time loss, 43,45 whereas others do not report any correlation. 20,39 It is possible that proximal location is not a prognostic factor by itself, but a consequence of the anatomical location of some of the connective structures (eg, proximal MTJ, biceps femoris cojoined tendon, and free tendon) that have proved to cause longer time loss when they are involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that in recent years certain publications have downplayed or questioned the role of MRI in monitoring muscle injuries [ 21 , 26 ], the current results demonstrate that certain MRI findings are predictive of reinjuries and may be a useful tool in the multifactorial decision-making process of recovery and RTP [ 35 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In football, thigh muscle injuries are the most common injuries, rectus femoris (RF) being the most frequent location in the quadriceps 4,[6][7][8][9] When deciding the best treatment for a muscle injury, a correct diagnosis and injury classification are the first steps. 10 A full comprehension of the muscle belly affected, the injury location, and an evaluation of the connective tissue damage are the basis for designing the treatment. 10,11 The most common treatment approach for RF injuries is nonoperative, but there are certain indications in which surgical treatment should be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 A full comprehension of the muscle belly affected, the injury location, and an evaluation of the connective tissue damage are the basis for designing the treatment. 10,11 The most common treatment approach for RF injuries is nonoperative, but there are certain indications in which surgical treatment should be considered. 5,[12][13][14][15] Understanding newly discovered anatomical structures of the RF can aid in diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%