Background: Distal triceps rupture is a rare injury that is commonly surgically repaired to improve elbow strength and function. Most patients are active and have goals to return to specific activities and sports. There is no gold standard rehabilitation protocol for return to sport (RTS) after distal triceps repair. Purpose: To identify in the literature any criteria used for RTS after distal triceps repair. Study Design: Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, level 1 to 4 studies that examined distal triceps repair and had a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months were deemed eligible for study inclusion. Exclusion criteria encompassed studies that employed nonoperative treatment, lacked specific RTS criteria, or involved revision cases. The selected studies underwent assessment regarding RTS outcomes, timelines, rates, and methodological quality. Results: Of the initial 378 unique studies, 6 studies (including 116 patients involved in 16 different sports) met the inclusion criteria. Four of the studies reported RTS rates, with a mean of 89.3%. The duration of time for returning to sport was reported in 2 studies and varied from 4 to 6 months. The parameters most emphasized in the rehabilitation protocols were progressive range of motion exercises, followed by early immobilization and progressive strengthening exercises. Supervised therapy was reported in only 2 (33%) studies. Although all studies included a rehabilitation protocol and 5 studies included a timeline for RTS, only 1 study provided subjective criteria, and no studies utilized specific objective measurement criteria. The overall study quality was fair. Conclusion: This review demonstrated that the overall RTS rate after distal triceps repair was high (89.3%), with no consensus on RTS criteria. Most studies included initial immobilization followed by progressive range of motion and strengthening. Timing after surgery was used as a measure to RTS in the minority of studies and varied between 4 and 6 months. Further research is needed to develop functional and performance-based metrics to better standardize RTS criteria and rehabilitation protocols.
