2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3892593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return-to-Work Policies' Clawback Regime and Labor Supply in Disability Insurance Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Campolieti and Riddell (2012) conclude that the introduction of an annual earnings disregard in Canada has substantial effects on LFP but no effects on DI entry or exit. Zaresani (2018); Zaresani et al (2021) find sizeable effects on labor supply and earnings of return-to-work policies comparing two Canadian provinces with different clawback regimes. Ruh and Staubli (2018) explore a relaxation of the earnings restrictions in Austria and find an increase in LFP among DI beneficiaries that is entirely offset by the increase in new claimants.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Campolieti and Riddell (2012) conclude that the introduction of an annual earnings disregard in Canada has substantial effects on LFP but no effects on DI entry or exit. Zaresani (2018); Zaresani et al (2021) find sizeable effects on labor supply and earnings of return-to-work policies comparing two Canadian provinces with different clawback regimes. Ruh and Staubli (2018) explore a relaxation of the earnings restrictions in Austria and find an increase in LFP among DI beneficiaries that is entirely offset by the increase in new claimants.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Alternative policy approaches adopted in other countries avoid a notch in the benefit schedule by introducing a gradual phaseout of benefits above an earnings threshold. But even under these policy designs the implicit tax rate may still ine ciently distort labor supply (Kostøl and Mogstad, 2014;Deuchert and Eugster, 2019;Ruh and Staubli, 2019;Zaresani and Olivo-Villabrille, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative policy approaches adopted in other countries avoid a notch in the benefit schedule by introducing a gradual phaseout of benefits above an earnings threshold. But even under these policy designs the implicit tax rate may still inefficiently distort labor supply (Kostøl and Mogstad, 2014;Deuchert and Eugster, 2019;Ruh and Staubli, 2019;Zaresani and Olivo-Villabrille, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%