1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns from strategic anthelmintic treatments in village cattle in the Gambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are related to an average benefit-cost ratio of 1.14 for the intervention (implying borderline profitability) [8]. The estimates obtained from the GEE model confirmed the trends observed in overall descriptive plots in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They are related to an average benefit-cost ratio of 1.14 for the intervention (implying borderline profitability) [8]. The estimates obtained from the GEE model confirmed the trends observed in overall descriptive plots in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…For this, liveweight and calving rates were regressed on predicted FEC levels. In the same way, profitability of deworming, expressed as the benefit-cost ratio from Itty et al [8] were correlated with the Poisson predicted FEC. Although the treatment had highly significant effects on both FEC and productivity measures [24,25], the herd level FECs were not significantly correlated with herd level productivity measures such as calving rates and body weights (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations