2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns to articles versus pages in academic publishing: Do salary-setters show ‘article illusion’?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first analysis adds an extra covariate—the count of articles ever published by each academic. Citations are higher for academics who publish more articles, conditional upon their total number of coauthor‐, size‐, and quality‐adjusted pages (Gibson ). Thus in Table , the citation counts may act as a proxy for an excluded relevant variable—the total number of articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first analysis adds an extra covariate—the count of articles ever published by each academic. Citations are higher for academics who publish more articles, conditional upon their total number of coauthor‐, size‐, and quality‐adjusted pages (Gibson ). Thus in Table , the citation counts may act as a proxy for an excluded relevant variable—the total number of articles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have the HRH specification of citations variables 24. The statistical significance of the total count of articles-with no differentiation into journal tiers-for the journal assessment schemes that are most convex (LP, KMS, K&Y, and CLh) suggests that quality and quantity of journal output is relevant to pay, as also shown in Gibson (2014) but this pattern also is hidden by the journal tiers approach. along with our specification of journals variables.…”
Section: Reconciliation With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These rankings, in turn, determine the perception of the quality of authors, universities and journals. Such impressions of quality play a central role in determining academics' job market outcomes and the receipt of grants, prize, awards and honors (Hamermesh, 2013(Hamermesh, , 2018Ellison, 2013;Gibson, 2014;Gibson et al, 2014;Anauati et al, 2016;Sandnes, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between publication patterns and salary has also been investigated. In a study of 223 economists at the University of California, Gibson (2014) found that splitting results into several shorter articles instead of fewer longer articles gives higher salaries. Jin and Cho (2015) found a correlation between Korean academic salaries and international journal articles, while no correlation between salaries and national journals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%