2020
DOI: 10.1111/apel.12284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns to education among the informally employed in Thailand

Abstract: Thailand experienced rapid economic development and made significant investments in education over the past four decades; however, more than half of Thai workers remain informally employed. Despite the prevalence and persistence of informal work in Thailand, little is known about the returns to investments in formal education among informal workers. Using individual‐level data from the 2011, 2013, and 2015 Thailand Household Socio‐economic Surveys, this study estimates the wage returns to years of education fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The return on tertiary education gradually decreased along with the return on basic education during the 2007-2012 period but slightly increased in 2017. The magnitude and sign of the estimated coefficients for the effects of education and gender are comparable to those in the existing literature (Tangtipongkul 2015;Vivatsurakit and Vechbanyongratana 2020;Warunsiri and McNown 2010). The decreasing return on education was similarly reported by Tangtipongkul (2015).…”
Section: First-stage Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The return on tertiary education gradually decreased along with the return on basic education during the 2007-2012 period but slightly increased in 2017. The magnitude and sign of the estimated coefficients for the effects of education and gender are comparable to those in the existing literature (Tangtipongkul 2015;Vivatsurakit and Vechbanyongratana 2020;Warunsiri and McNown 2010). The decreasing return on education was similarly reported by Tangtipongkul (2015).…”
Section: First-stage Regression Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%