2021
DOI: 10.4038/tar.v32i1.8442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns to Factors of Production and Total Factor Productivity in Coconut Plantations in Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the diminishing growth of the coconut sector may be the reason of lack of research and development; poor infrastructure; and problems with technology transfer resulting from inputs used in stage III of production and the technological frontier has not expanded. This study's results are consistent with Sri Lanka's food manufacturing industry -0.61% [23] and inconsistent with the rate of growth of TFP recorded for coconut in Kerala at 0.051%, a study conducted for the period 1980-81 to 2004-05 [29] , for coconut in the Philippines at 1.52% [30], and the most recent study conducted by [30] for the Sri Lankan coconut plantation sector, indicating that large-scale plantations have positive TFP growth of 0.083%. Smallholders are more responsible for the negative TFP growth.…”
Section: Tfp Growth In Coconut Sectorsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for the diminishing growth of the coconut sector may be the reason of lack of research and development; poor infrastructure; and problems with technology transfer resulting from inputs used in stage III of production and the technological frontier has not expanded. This study's results are consistent with Sri Lanka's food manufacturing industry -0.61% [23] and inconsistent with the rate of growth of TFP recorded for coconut in Kerala at 0.051%, a study conducted for the period 1980-81 to 2004-05 [29] , for coconut in the Philippines at 1.52% [30], and the most recent study conducted by [30] for the Sri Lankan coconut plantation sector, indicating that large-scale plantations have positive TFP growth of 0.083%. Smallholders are more responsible for the negative TFP growth.…”
Section: Tfp Growth In Coconut Sectorsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The study also concluded that there has to be a significant improvement in national data collection to have more reliable indicators of TFP growth trends in the building industry and the overall construction industry. Swarnathilake, C, Weerahewa, J and Bandara, Y. M. [23] , estimated the food manufacturing industry growth from 1978 -2014 by adopting the Cobb -Douglas production function framework and found that the growth is -0.61%.…”
Section: Tfp Growth In Specific Sub-sectors In Sri Lankamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the interactive system of cross-border e-commerce trade and industrial clusters, in addition to the cross-border e-commerce trade subsystem, industrial cluster subsystem, production factors and product subsystems and other subsystems, there is also an external environment subsystem. This is mainly because in the process of interaction between the cross-border e-commerce trade and industrial clusters, it will still be affected and acted upon by various factors in the external environment, and even play a boosting or restricting role [46]. Specifically, the external environment subsystem includes the policy environment, social environment, economic environment, technical environment, emergencies and so on.…”
Section: Analysis Of Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because, the stochastic frontier approach was recommended for agricultural applications (Coelli 1995a, b;Ferrara and Vidoli 2017). Many earlier studies have used the same approach for TFP analysis (Abeysekara and Prasada, 2021;Alam et al, 2011;Arazmuradov et al, 2014;Coelli et al, 2003;Hayatullah, 2017;Kim, 2010;Kim andHan, 2001 andShahabinejad et al, 2013). The stochastic frontier production function for panel data can be written as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%