of renewable energies need them to couple with energy storage devices. [1][2][3][4] Aqueous batteries stand out from many types of batteries, due to their intrinsic safe, low material costs, and facile manufacturing as well. [5][6][7] One of the typical examples is lead-acid batteries that have been commercialized and adopted in many fields. [8][9][10] However, the strong corrosion on cell components caused by highly concentrated acid, the unsatisfactory cycle life, and the high toxicity of Pb to organisms greatly limit the applications of lead-acid batteries. [10][11][12] Hence, aqueous metal-ion batteries based on alkali ions, alkaline-earth metal ions, and Zn 2+ are considered intensively to address these concerns. [13][14][15][16] However, their large ionic radii are very harmful to rate capability. Compared to these ions, protons as the charge carriers have the unique advantages, such as a small ion size, a low molar mass, and a high abundance in nature. [9,17,18] Moreover, benefited from Grotthuss mechanism, protons in aqueous electrolytes and in electrode materials would exhibit high ionic conductivity, facilitating the reaction kinetics and rate capability. [19][20][21] Up to now, metal oxides, prussian blue analogues (PBA), and organic materials have been explored as cathode materials of proton batteries. Gogotsi et al. reported the proton-intercalation chemistry in MnO 2 based on surface reactions. [22] Hu et al. [23] found that RuO 2 •xH 2 O nanotubes had a specific capacitance of 1300 F g −1 related to proton insertion/extraction. Ji et al. [20] demonstrated that one of Turnbull's blue, in which protons were transferred via Grotthuss mechanism, presented extraordinary rate performances up to 4000 C (380 A g −1 , 508 mA cm −2 ) and ultralong cycling about 0.73 million cycles. Compared with the case of cathode materials, the anode materials are rarely reported. [24][25][26][27] MoO 3 as one of the anode materials has promising perspectives, due to its high capacity, low cost, and layer structure. Yan and co-workers [25] prepared MoO 3 by calcining MoS 2 nanosheets in air, which showed a capacity of 152 mAh g −1 at 5 C in 1 m H 2 SO 4 . The capacity, however, went down to ≈68% of the initial data only after 100 cycles at 10 C or ≈67% at 50 C. It was attributed to the dissolution of MoO 3 and the formation of polyoxometalate, resulting in the capacity fading. Thus, Zhao et al. [26] used highly concentrated H 2 SO 4 (6 m) to inhibit the detrimental dissolution of MoO 3 . Although cycling stability Rechargeable proton batteries are attractive, because protons as a charge carrier have a small ionic radius, a lightest mass, and a high abundance on Earth. MoO 3 , as one of the promising anode materials in rechargeable proton batteries, suffers from the severe dissolution in acidic electrolytes upon cycling.Here, an ultrathin TiO 2 shell is coated on MoO 3 nanorods to suppress the detrimental dissolution during cycles. TiO 2 also lowers the desolvation energy of hydrated protons, promoting the reaction kinetics...