2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02571-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reusing and Composing Tests with Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation has been addressed by refactoring the collection framework using TraitTest (Ducasse et al, 2009). We make a different assumption here: the base system must be preserved, which implies that a refactoring is not desirable.…”
Section: Reverse Generics In Pharomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This situation has been addressed by refactoring the collection framework using TraitTest (Ducasse et al, 2009). We make a different assumption here: the base system must be preserved, which implies that a refactoring is not desirable.…”
Section: Reverse Generics In Pharomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method could then be overridden in subclasses (factory method design pattern (Gamma et al, 1995)). However, this solution is not always the best approach: First, tests of the collection libraries cannot be optimally organized using single inheritance (Ducasse et al, 2009). Second, the code to be reused may not always be editable and modifiable.…”
Section: Reverse Generics In Pharomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method determines whether or not a test is rotten, even in presence of helper methods and trait composition [16,17]. Delplanque et al evaluated their method on a small sample of 17 Pharo projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%