2019
DOI: 10.31017/cdh.2019.(2019-005)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revalidación de Liolaemus choique Abdala, Quinteros, Scrocchi y Stazzonelli, 2010 (Iguania: Liolaemidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…scorialis Troncoso-Palacios, Díaz, Esquerré & Urra, 2015;and L. smaug Abdala, Quinteros, Scrocchi & Stazzonelli, 2010. Additionally, the status of L. choique Abdala, Quinteros, Scrocchi & Stazzonelli, 2010, is disputed because it was found as paraphyletic in a DNA phylogenetic study by Medina et al (2017), stating that results "does not support" to L. choique as valid species, because "individuals (from the type locality) are genetically related to L. antumalguen and L. smaug"; but later, Ruiz et al (2019b) revalidated L. choique through a morphologic statistical study, which compared L. choique and L. smaug (without comparisons in regards to L. antumalguen).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scorialis Troncoso-Palacios, Díaz, Esquerré & Urra, 2015;and L. smaug Abdala, Quinteros, Scrocchi & Stazzonelli, 2010. Additionally, the status of L. choique Abdala, Quinteros, Scrocchi & Stazzonelli, 2010, is disputed because it was found as paraphyletic in a DNA phylogenetic study by Medina et al (2017), stating that results "does not support" to L. choique as valid species, because "individuals (from the type locality) are genetically related to L. antumalguen and L. smaug"; but later, Ruiz et al (2019b) revalidated L. choique through a morphologic statistical study, which compared L. choique and L. smaug (without comparisons in regards to L. antumalguen).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%