2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revascularization for Intermittent Claudication Significantly Increases the 5-year Risk of Major Amputation in the Veterans Health Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for patients with minimal symptoms, invasive therapy as the first-line treatment can prove to be more harmful than beneficial. 1 , 7 George et al 3 demonstrated that patients within the Veterans Affairs Administration healthcare system who had received intervention for claudication had three to four times the risk of future amputation than those who did not undergo intervention. They also showed that earlier intervention of IC led to faster disease progression from IC to chronic limb-threatening ischemia compared with later interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, for patients with minimal symptoms, invasive therapy as the first-line treatment can prove to be more harmful than beneficial. 1 , 7 George et al 3 demonstrated that patients within the Veterans Affairs Administration healthcare system who had received intervention for claudication had three to four times the risk of future amputation than those who did not undergo intervention. They also showed that earlier intervention of IC led to faster disease progression from IC to chronic limb-threatening ischemia compared with later interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also showed that earlier intervention of IC led to faster disease progression from IC to chronic limb-threatening ischemia compared with later interventions. 3 Furthermore, according to the SVS practice guidelines, when managing multisegment disease, the proximal disease should be treated first, because such treatment might improve symptoms without needing to treat the more distal vasculature. 6 For complex asymmetric complex aortoiliac bifurcation disease, such as in our patient, Suh et al 8 have shown the benefits of unilateral stenting in reducing the overall stent number and preservation of femoral access sites for future crossover interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation