2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealed social preferences of Dutch political parties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the German income tax, progression is indeed particularly pronounced for middle incomes, a phenomenon referred to as the "Mittelstandsbauch" (middle class belly). This is similar in the Netherlands, see Jacobs et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In the German income tax, progression is indeed particularly pronounced for middle incomes, a phenomenon referred to as the "Mittelstandsbauch" (middle class belly). This is similar in the Netherlands, see Jacobs et al (2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, Jacquet, Lehmann and Van der Linden (2013) merge the Mirrlees model of optimal income taxation with labor supply on the intensive margin with Diamond (1980)'s model of optimal income taxation with labor supply on the extensive margin. Jacobs et al (2017) follow their analysis and demonstrate that in this model the marginal cost of public funds is once more equal to one in the tax optimum if the Diamond-based measure for the marginal costs of public funds is employed. Participation distortions are therefore not a reason why the marginal cost of public funds would rise above one in the tax optimum.…”
Section: Implications For Other Public Policiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the downside, a substantial fraction of low-income households do not take up the cash transfers designed for them. Furthermore, large kinks and notches imply large differences in the implicit social welfare weights for households that differ only slightly in their taxable income or wealth, which is inconsistent with a well-behaved social welfare function (Jacobs et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%