Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces sa ri ly repre sent the opi ni on of the ZEW.Download this ZEW Discussion Paper from our ftp server:ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp11020.pdf Our empirical results are based on both OLS and natural spline regressions using survey data from over 700 German municipal leaders in the state of Baden-Württemberg. They
Non-technical summaryshow that most politicians perceive other municipalities within their own state as the strongest competitive force. Yet, a crucial caveat to this finding concerns municipalities 'near' a border, in which politicians also perceive a strong competitive threat from across the border. This corroborates the idea that municipalities near a border have a broader reference group than is commonly assumed in the existing literature. Moreover, the importance of borders as a dividing line varies depending on the type of border. First, ceteris paribus, their effect is weaker (i.e., less constraining) for national than international borders: this means decision-makers in municipalities up to roughly 20km from the border take competition with jurisdictions beyond the border into consideration when a national, inter-regional border, is concerned, while the equivalent effect of an international border ceases after approximately 12.5km. Second, in our sample the French-German border is shown to have a stronger effect than the Swiss-German border. One tentative explanation is that politicians perceive the cultural dimension of these respective borders (i.e., language) to be more important than the institutional dimension (EU versus non-EU).Alternatively, it could reflect Switzerland's more aggressive corporate tax policy. Overall, our findings suggest that geographically close municipalities perceive each other as competitors for mobile capital regardless of the state or country where they are located.This indicates a need to refine the commonly used contiguity-and distance-based neighbourhood matrices by treating border-municipalities differently from in-land ones to avoid biased estimations of spatial interactions.
This version: March 2011Abstract Studies of spatial policy interdependence in (local) public policies usually concentrate on the relations between jurisdictions within a single analysed region, and disregard possible extra-regional effects. This paper evaluates the validity of such restriction by studying German local politicians' assessments of their jurisdictions' main competitors in the struggle to attract firms. We find that location near a border significantly undermines poli...