Revealing moments: formulating understandings of adverse experiences in a health appraisal interview

Beach, Wayne A.; Dixson, C.N.

doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00118-0

Cited by 105 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When formatted to display understanding of the emotional consequences of a client's circumstances, an orientation to emotion can facilitate moves to a range of potential other activities (Beach & Dixson, 2001;Muntigl et al, 2014;Pudlinsky, 2005;Ruusuvuori, 2007;Voutilainen, 2012). It does this by conveying that a sufficient amount of information has been provided for a therapist to appreciate a client's emotional state.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orienting to Emotion in Computer-Mediated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Ekberg

Shaw

Keßler

et al. 2016

Research on Language and Social Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms commiserations (e.g., "I'm sorry to hear that") and their affective inferences (e.g., "that sounds very scary for you"). Both practices routinely prefaced moves to pursue a range of therapeutic activities, many of which did not prioritise sustained focus on the emotion that had just been oriented to. By separating message composition from message transmission, the modality used for these therapy sessions enabled therapists to combine orientations to emotion with attempts to shift the focus of discussion. Our analysis finds that although physically co-present and computer-mediated psychotherapy share a common focus on emotional experience, the modality used for therapy can be relevant in the design and use of these orientations. Data are in British English.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orienting to Emotion in Computer-Mediated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Ekberg

Shaw

Keßler

et al. 2016

Research on Language and Social Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In terms of understanding, doctors use declarative questions as formulations of patients' prior turns in order to ground their understanding as an intersubjective fact (Clark and Schaefer 1989), thus facilitating topical closure and interactional progression to next-positioned matters (cf. Beach and Dixson 2001).…”

Section: Declarative Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They adapt the patient's talk to the doctor's perspective or to his linguistic register, summing it up and redesigning it according to the practical concerns of the business of history taking (cf. Beach and Dixson 2001). 4 With these properties, paraphrasing declarative questions can extend the common ground of the participants, mediating prior talk with different perspectives and interactional tasks.…”

Section: Paraphrasing Declarative Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Doctors' Questions as Displays of Understanding

Deppermann

Spranz-Fogasy

2012

Communication & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They restrict their treatment to formulations which are produced as responsive actions and which make confirmation by the producer of the original version relevant. Most research in CA has adopted this more narrow use of ''formulations'' (e.g., Heritage 1985;Beach and Dixson 2001;Drew 2003;Antaki et al 2005;Hutchby 2005;Barnes 2007;Antaki 2008). Virtually all studies focus on functional aspects of formulations.…”

Section: Formulations As Objects Of Research In Camentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Institutional concerns: Their design orients to practical relevancies, such as providing a and subsuming to a professional perspective (Hutchby 2005;, this volume), closing topical sequences and fixing their outcomes (Barnes 2007), shaping prior talk so as to become a suitable basis for next actions to be performed (Antaki 2008;Hutchby 2005;Beach and Dixson 2001), reducing abundant complexity of arguments by summarizing (Deppermann and Spranz-Fogasy 1998). Doing so, formulations in turn are basic practices to get institutional work observably being done in interaction.…”

Section: Generalization and Abstraction As Practices Of Formulation Imentioning

confidence: 99%

The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics

Deppermann

2011

Hum Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As an Introduction to the Special Issue on ''Formulation, generalization, and abstraction in interaction,'' this paper discusses key problems of a conversation analytic (CA) approach to semantics in interaction. Prior research in CA and Interactional Linguistics has only rarely dealt with issues of linguistic meaning in interaction. It is argued that this is a consequence of limitations of sequential analysis to capture meaning in interaction. While sequential analysis remains the encompassing methodological framework, it is suggested that it needs to be complemented by analyzing semantic relationships between choices of formulation in the interaction, ethnography, and structural techniques of comparing selected options with possible alternatives. The paper describes the methodological approach taken to interactional semantics by the papers in the Special Issue, which analyse practices of generalization and abstraction in interaction as they are accomplished by formulations of prior versions of reference and description.

show abstract

Revealing moments: formulating understandings of adverse experiences in a health appraisal interview

Cited by 105 publications

References 35 publications

Orienting to Emotion in Computer-Mediated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Orienting to Emotion in Computer-Mediated Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Doctors' Questions as Displays of Understanding

The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About