The ratio of the mean square amplitude root of thermal vibrations and the interatomic distance is a universal constant ls at the melting temperature T m . The classical Gibbs free energy change completed by a volume energy saving ls (or lg )×H m that governs the liquid to solid and liquid to ultrastable glass transformations leads to a universal constant equal to ls (or lg ), H m being the crystal melting enthalpy. The minimum values 0.217 of ls and 0.103 of ls are used to predict ultra-stable glass formation in pure metallic liquid elements at a universal reduced temperature g = (T g T m )/T m = 0.6223.
1-IntroductionThe dependence of the liquid supercooling temperature on the superheating rate shows the existence of long-lived metastable nuclei surviving above the melting temperature T m [1]. The classical Gibbs free energy change cannot predict the presence of such entities without introducing a complementary negative contribution v×p varying with 2 = (T-T m ) 2 /T 2 m , v being the nucleus volume and p a complementary Laplace pressure [2,3]. Crystallisation and melting are initiated by the formation of solid or liquid growth nuclei accompanied by a volume change that is expected to obey to Lindemann's rule [4]. Lindemann's description shows that the ratio of the mean square amplitude root of thermal vibrations and the interatomic distance is a universal constant ls at the melting temperature T m .The critical complement v×p associated with crystallisation at T = T m has been determined for many pure liquid elements and glass-forming melts as being equal to v× ls0 ×H m /V m with ls0 being a numerical critical fraction of the melting heat H m . The coefficient ls0 = 0.217 is the same for many liquid elements [2], while it is much larger than 1 and smaller than 2 in many glass-forming melts, as shown for 84 examples Tables 2 and 3 in [5]. The objective of this study is to relate ls0 to the Lindemann ratio ls .The ultra-stable glass state is described as a thermodynamic equilibrium between crystal and liquid states, which would be attained by supercluster formation and their percolation after a very long annealing time at the Kauzmann temperature T K [5], or by quenching the melt from above T m and annealing it at the formation temperature T sg of this phase [6]. The optimum formation temperature T sg leading to the higher density is always equal to the Kauzmann temperature of strong glasses, and very often to that of fragile glasses. The enthalpy that is recovered at the glass transition temperature T g is equal to ( ls0 - gs0 )×H m in strong glasses and to 1.5×( ls0 - gs0 )×H m in fragile glasses with gs0 being the critical fraction of melting heat leading to crystallisation of a virtual glass at T m . This description agrees, in principle, with the Cite as arXiv : 1511.07984 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] or