2017
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the Diversity of Natural Hydrologic Regimes in California with Relevance for Environmental Flows Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(169 reference statements)
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-magnitude flow analysis naturally raises the question: how would the diversion of the estimated HMF influence the availability of environmental flows? HMFs are important for sediment transport, channel formation and scouring (Fisher 1983, Baron et al 2002, Lane et al 2016, maintaining riparian vegetation (Hupp andOsterkamp 1985, Sparks 1995), facilitating upstream and downstream dispersal of native riparian organisms (Meffe 1984, Moyle andLight 1996), and inducing spawning in native fishes (Baumgartner et al 2014). While diverting flood flows for groundwater recharge could provide potential benefits for flood risk mitigation (Hanak and Lund 2012), it could also impact the availability of environmental flows.…”
Section: Environmental (Instream) Flow Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-magnitude flow analysis naturally raises the question: how would the diversion of the estimated HMF influence the availability of environmental flows? HMFs are important for sediment transport, channel formation and scouring (Fisher 1983, Baron et al 2002, Lane et al 2016, maintaining riparian vegetation (Hupp andOsterkamp 1985, Sparks 1995), facilitating upstream and downstream dispersal of native riparian organisms (Meffe 1984, Moyle andLight 1996), and inducing spawning in native fishes (Baumgartner et al 2014). While diverting flood flows for groundwater recharge could provide potential benefits for flood risk mitigation (Hanak and Lund 2012), it could also impact the availability of environmental flows.…”
Section: Environmental (Instream) Flow Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lane, Dahlke, and Sandoval‐Solis () recently classified California streams using a similar inductive–deductive approach, classifying according to streamflow data and validating using environmental variables. They partitioned reference condition streams into seven classes defined according to the primary drivers of hydrological variation in streams: snowmelt, rain, groundwater, ephemeral streams, and multiple transitional classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four hydrologic scenarios characteristic of the mixed snowmelt and rain flow regime typical of Mediterranean‐montane systems were evaluated (Lane, Dahlke, Pasternack, & Sandoval‐Solis, ): unimpaired wet, unimpaired dry, altered wet, and altered dry annual flow regimes (Figure ). Daily streamflow time series for two midelevation gauge stations in the western Sierra Nevada, California, were chosen to represent these archetypal flow regimes under unimpaired (North Yuba River below Goodyears Bar) and altered (New Colgate Powerhouse) conditions (see Section S2.2 for map of gauge locations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%