2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7wrgh
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgments

Abstract: Objects can be characterized according to a vast number of possible criteria (e.g. animacy, shape, color, function), but some dimensions are more useful than others for making sense of the objects around us. To identify these "core dimensions" of object representations, we developed a data-driven computational model of similarity judgments for real-world images of 1,854 objects. The model captured most explainable variance in similarity judgments and produced 49 highly reproducible and meaningful object dimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perception of similarities is the outcome of an active comparison process between multiple objects. For complex real-world objects, it relies on the integration of information across multiple feature dimensions, and this integration is characterized by a high degree of flexibility (Medin et al, 1993;Hebart et al, 2020). As such, it is perhaps not surprising that reported perceived similarities between objects vary across observers (see also Goldstone, 1994;Goldstone & Son, 2012), and have behavioural relevance in performance of object discrimination, as shown in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Perception of similarities is the outcome of an active comparison process between multiple objects. For complex real-world objects, it relies on the integration of information across multiple feature dimensions, and this integration is characterized by a high degree of flexibility (Medin et al, 1993;Hebart et al, 2020). As such, it is perhaps not surprising that reported perceived similarities between objects vary across observers (see also Goldstone, 1994;Goldstone & Son, 2012), and have behavioural relevance in performance of object discrimination, as shown in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Here, we presented a first foray into this domain by showing that ecoset training leads to an increase in face-selective units in final network layers. Moving further into the domain of behavior, it will be of interest to perform in-depth tests of ecoset-trained networks (supervised or unsupervised) to compare their task performance and error distributions against human behavioral data (39)(40)(41)(42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the central goals of computational visual neuroscience is a model that can predict neural representations in visual cortex at multiple levels of granularity, from single neuron responses to the aggregated population signals measured via fMRI, and can also predict the perceptual properties of our visual systems, as measured in behavioural experiments (Funke et al, 2020;Hebart et al, 2020;Rajalingham et al, 2018;Schrimpf et al, 2018;. We were therefore interested in whether models that predicted fMRI-based representational dissimilarities in human IT better also predicted electrophysiological or behavioural object perception data better.…”
Section: Differences In Hit Correspondence Between Trained Models Do mentioning
confidence: 99%