2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-01016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the role of the cathode–electrolyte interface on solid-state batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
97
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(The ionic conductivity of these materials are reported separately [19] ). Further annealing at T>543 K resulted in the lower ion conductivity tetragonal phase of NPS.…”
Section: Methods and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(The ionic conductivity of these materials are reported separately [19] ). Further annealing at T>543 K resulted in the lower ion conductivity tetragonal phase of NPS.…”
Section: Methods and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milling times of 1-4 h were studied and a 2-h milling period was selected. The final highly conductive phase (cubic-NPS) was achieved after 2 h of annealing at 543 K under Ar (The ionic conductivity of these materials were reported separately [19] ). Further annealing at T > 543 K resulted in the lower ion conductivity tetragonal phase of NPS.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The batteries with (104)oriented NCM thin film exhibited higher interface resistances than those of (001)-exhibited NCM thin film, suggesting the importance of the crystallographic presentation of SEs and CAMs on interfacial diffusion kinetics. To further prove the effect in larger format SSBs concepts, Zahiri et al prepared a series of highly crystallographically oriented, crystalline, thick, and dense alkali ion TM oxide cathodes contacted with various SEs to comprehensively study the role that crystallography and interface morphology plays in the performance of SSBs [81]. As expected, a direct effect of interfacial crystallography on SSBs performance is shown by the linear correlation between interfacial ion transport and capacity fade.…”
Section: Microscopic Scalesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Structural inhomogeneities inside the composite cathode ranging from nanometer to micrometer scales can often dominate the ionic conductivity [37]. The prime example is the influence of interface crystallographic orientation between SEs and CAMs [78,80,81]. In composite cathodes, CAM and SE often possess different crystal structures, which usually causes the mismatch of interfaces, further seriously blocking the transportation of Li + at the interface, especially for CAMs with high specific surface area.…”
Section: Microscopic Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19–22 The SPEs can have flexible contact with the positive and negative electrodes, but their high crystallinity at room temperature leads to low ionic conductivity. 23–25 Due to the Lewis acid–base effect between fillers and polymers, the fillers not only reduce the crystallinity and increase the ionic conductivity, but also improve the mechanical properties and safety properties. 26,27 Therefore, CSEs are one of the most promising solid electrolytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%