Vegetation restoration is commonly recognized as one of the most effective measures for soil and water conservation (Feng et al., 2016;Teo et al., 2022;Wang et al., 2016). From a water conservation point of view, vegetation restoration can enhance rainfall infiltration as the presence of root/plant residue and increased surface roughness can reduce the amount and velocity of surface runoff (Dunne et al., 1991;Wang et al., 2012Wang et al., , 2013. Vegetation restoration also increases soil water holding capacity and can hold more soil water in place by physically binding soil particles together (Ran et al., 2013;Yang et al., 2016). From a soil conservation point of view, vegetation restoration can intercept rainfall and reduce its energy to prevent splash erosion. It also slows down and reduces surface runoff to mitigate flood and sheet erosion (Guo et al., 2019). Moreover, vegetation restoration can anchor and reinforce soil particles with its spreading root systems (Legates et al., 2011) and stabilize hillslopes through axial root reinforcement to weaken gravitational erosion (Burylo et al., 2011). While these soil and water conservation benefits from vegetation restoration have been investigated from the land-atmosphere coupling perspective (Forzieri et al., 2017;Li et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2021Zhang et al., , 2022, these studies generally focus on total precipitation (P) changes without further understanding the feedbacks between vegetation restoration and erosive P through revegetation-induced redistributions of water and energy budgets. Moreover, it is still not clear how the erosive proportion of total P responds to large-scale revegetation and to what extent it affects soil conservation (Li et al., 2018;Trenberth, 1999). Improved understanding of land-atmosphere interactions with explicit representation of vegetation dynamics is, therefore, key toward a more comprehensive assessment of the