Revelations of delirium subtype research: A bibliometric analysis of publications in the past twenty years in the field

Zhou, Wen; Bai, Xue; Yang, Yun; Huang, Miao; Zheng, Qiulan; Wu, Jian; Wang, Rui; Gan, Xiaoliang

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103561

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies did not deepen this cognitive impairment into different subtypes perspectives, although DSM-5 has listed three delirium subtypes. A biliometric analysis revealed that there were only around 300 publications were available in past two decades [27]. Compared with previous studies regarding delirium knowledge assessment [28][29][30], we developed a novel measurement tool to evaluate nurses' ability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of nurse’s assessment ability questionnaire in delirium subtypes: Based on Delphi expert consensus

Zhou,

Zheng,

Huang

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Delirium, a common occurrence in clinical work, can be divided into three subtypes according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5 th Edition (DSM-5). Each subtype has its special significance and focus. As the primary caregivers and observer of delirious patients, nurses should be able to quickly and accurately indentify each subtype. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify nurses’ assessment ability of delirium subtypes. However, there is currently no suitable questionnaire available for investigating nurses’ assessment ability of delirium subtypes. Objective To develop a scientifically validated questionnaire for assessing nursing assessment ability of delirium subtypes based on Knowledge-Attitude-Practice(KAP) Model. Methods The questionnaire was conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 to assess the KAP status of nurses the regarding delirium subtype. A two-round Delphi Method was employed to revise the draft questionnaire, ensuring the importance and rationality of each item. Ten experts specializing in critically ill patients, clinical nursing, and nursing management were invited from seven provinces in China for the Delphi process. Additionally, we validated the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Results The return rate in the first and second rounds were 83% and 100%, respectively. The individual authority coefficients for the two rounds of correspondence ranged from 0.787 to 0.987, while the overall authority coefficient of experts was 0.866. Kendall’s coefficient of coordination for the importance scores were found to be 0.192 and 0.156, respectively, whereas those for rationality scores were calculated as 0.149 and 0.141, respectively. Notably, all mean values of importance and rationality scores in the two rounds were exceeded a threshold of 4.10 across both rounds of assessment with coefficient variations (CV) ranging from 0.00 to 0.19 for importance ratings and 0.00 to 0.16 for rationality ratings, both of which were <0.25. Experts proposed modifications to eleven items while introducing four new ones into consideration during this process; thus ensuring that reliability and validity standards were met by the final questionnaire design which consists of a total of thirty-seven items distributed across four dimensions: delirium subtype-related knowledge, assessment attitude, assessment practice, and knowledge source–thereby establishing its clinical relevance as a reliable scientific instrument. Conclusion The development process is both scientific and theoretical, encompassing reliable expert correspondence results and a diverse range of question formats. As thus, effectively captures the current landscape of delirium subtypes assessment among clinical nurses from multiple perspectives, including knowledge level and source, attitude, assessment behavior, and assessment barriers. It offers comprehensive and detailed insights.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of nurse’s assessment ability questionnaire in delirium subtypes: Based on Delphi expert consensus

Zhou,

Zheng,

Huang

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics empower the application of mathematical and statistical techniques to quantitatively scrutinize a multitude of articles within a designated research domain, thereby unveiling its research status and trajectories. CiteSpace and VOSviewer constitute the preeminent literature information visualization software tools, extensively employed across diverse disciplines such as medicine, science and technology, economic governance, jurisprudence, agronomy, and humanities ( 19 – 24 ). Within the realm of metabolic disorders, a multitude of researchers have harnessed this methodology to assess their investigative content ( 25 – 30 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global research trends of diabetes remission: a bibliometric study

Yang,

He,

Chen

et al. 2023

Front. Endocrinol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundResearch on diabetes remission has garnered prominence in recent years. However, to date, no pertinent bibliometric study has been published. This study sought to elucidate the current landscape and pinpoint potential new research directions through a bibliometric analysis of diabetes remission.MethodsWe perused relevant articles on diabetes remission from January 1, 2000, to April 16, 2023, in the Web of Science. We utilized CiteSpace software and VOSviewer software to construct knowledge maps and undertake analysis of countries, institutional affiliations, author contributions, journals, and keywords. This analysis facilitated the identification of current research foci and forecasting future trends.ResultsA total of 970 English articles were procured, and the annual publication volume manifested a steady growth trend. Most of the articles originated from America (n=342, 35.26%), succeeded by China and England. Pertaining to institutions, the University of Newcastle in England proliferated the most articles (n=36, 3.71%). Taylor R authored the most articles (n=35, 3.61%), and his articles were also the most co-cited (n=1756 times). Obesity Surgery dominated in terms of published articles (n=81, 8.35%). “Bariatric surgery” was the most prevalently used keyword. The keyword-clustering map revealed that the research predominantly centered on diabetes remission, type 1 diabetes, bariatric surgery, and lifestyle interventions. The keyword emergence and keyword time-zone maps depicted hotspots and shifts in the domain of diabetes remission. Initially, the hotspots were primarily fundamental experiments probing the feasibilities and mechanisms of diabetes remission, such as transplantation. Over the course, the research trajectory transitioned from basic to clinical concerning diabetes remission through bariatric surgery, lifestyle interventions, and alternative strategies.ConclusionOver the preceding 20 years, the domain of diabetes remission has flourished globally. Bariatric surgery and lifestyle interventions bestow unique advantages for diabetes remission. Via the maps, the developmental milieu, research foci, and avant-garde trends in this domain are cogently portrayed, offering guidance for scholars.

show abstract

Ketamine and its enantiomers for depression: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023

Zhao,

Zhang,

Lou

et al. 2024

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Revelations of delirium subtype research: A bibliometric analysis of publications in the past twenty years in the field

Cited by 7 publications

References 45 publications

Development and validation of nurse’s assessment ability questionnaire in delirium subtypes: Based on Delphi expert consensus

Development and validation of nurse’s assessment ability questionnaire in delirium subtypes: Based on Delphi expert consensus

Global research trends of diabetes remission: a bibliometric study

Ketamine and its enantiomers for depression: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About