1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb01048.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revenue Streams and Clinical Discretion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without trust, the patient may not only be reluctant to agree to the services he is offered, he may also be suspicious on occasions when the physician suggests an intervention is necessary. 32 Good medicine may be good business, but such misapplications of good business models to an inappropriate context suggest that good business is not necessarily good medicine.…”
Section: Tqm and The Mcomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without trust, the patient may not only be reluctant to agree to the services he is offered, he may also be suspicious on occasions when the physician suggests an intervention is necessary. 32 Good medicine may be good business, but such misapplications of good business models to an inappropriate context suggest that good business is not necessarily good medicine.…”
Section: Tqm and The Mcomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Consistent with Schulz and Lewis's concerns, examination of a convenience sample of these publications reveals numerous serious errors in describing the study's results (Table 2). [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The most common and serious error was attributing inpatient hospitalizations to the cap although Soumerai et al found no significant relationship between the cap and hospital admission rates. 9,[11][12][13]19,21,23 Additional errors occurred when describing the cap itself, which was commonly represented as a formulary.…”
Section: The Original Study: Medicaid Prescription Drug Restrictions mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The most common and serious error was attributing inpatient hospitalizations to the cap although Soumerai et al found no significant relationship between the cap and hospital admission rates. 9,[11][12][13]19,21,23 Additional errors occurred when describing the cap itself, which was commonly represented as a formulary. 12,16,[19][20][21] Similarly, one description of the paper attributed negative outcomes to copayments despite Soumerai et al's finding that the risk of nursing home admission returned to its baseline (pre-cap) level when the cap was replaced by a $1 copayment.…”
Section: The Original Study: Medicaid Prescription Drug Restrictions mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation