“…In order to time-lock electrophysiological recordings to stimulus onset, a number of studies have employed intermittent (as opposed to constant) stimulus presentation methods (Leopold et al, 2002; Kornmeier and Bach, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2012; Kornmeier et al, 2007, 2009, 2014; Pitts et al, 2007, 2008; Britz et al, 2009; Intaitė et al, 2010, 2013, 2014; Ehm et al, 2011; Pitts and Britz, 2011). Intermittent paradigms, particularly those in which each trial consists of a brief stimulus (e.g., ~800 ms stimulus duration) followed by a brief blank interval (e.g., ~400 ms inter-stimulus interval (ISI)), have been shown to constrain perceptual reversals to occur only at stimulus-onset while approximating reversal rates found in constant presentation paradigms, i.e., reversals occur every ~2–6 s (Orbach et al, 1963, 1966; Leopold et al, 2002; Britz et al, 2009; Kornmeier et al, 2009).…”