2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
39
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intaitė et al (2010) argue that the RN does not reflect changes in conscious perception because in one of their conditions, exogenous reversals of unambiguous Necker cubes did not elicit an RN. It is justifiably assumed that any correlate of conscious perceptual change found for endogenous reversals of ambiguous stimuli should also be apparent for exogenous reversals of unambiguous stimulus variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Intaitė et al (2010) argue that the RN does not reflect changes in conscious perception because in one of their conditions, exogenous reversals of unambiguous Necker cubes did not elicit an RN. It is justifiably assumed that any correlate of conscious perceptual change found for endogenous reversals of ambiguous stimuli should also be apparent for exogenous reversals of unambiguous stimulus variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The aRN was strongest bilaterally at fronto-central locations while the visual RN is typically restricted to parietal and occipital sites (Pitts et al, 2007, 2008; but see Intaitė et al, 2010; Kornmeier and Bach, 2012). Similar to the visual RN, the aRN temporally overlaps the N1/P2 but does not appear to reflect a modulation of the N1 or P2 peaks as evidenced by marked differences in scalp topography, i.e., the N1 and P2 peaks showed a broad central or fronto-central distribution centered on the midline, while the aRN was clearly bilateral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations