2020
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2020.1728593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Engineering a Fully Collapsed Ancient Roman Temple through Geoarchaeology and DEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, simplified micromodeling is preferable to compromise the computational cost and accuracy, where the masonry units are expanded up to the half-thickness of the mortar joints, whereas the effect of mortar joints is taken into account via zero-thickness interfaces. In the case of dryjoint masonry constructions, masonry units are directly represented by discrete blocks [25,26], as illustrated in Figure 1. In this study, a simplified micromodeling approach is utilized to analyze both static and impact responses of dry-joint stone masonry arches using the discrete element method (DEM).…”
Section: Background: Discrete Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, simplified micromodeling is preferable to compromise the computational cost and accuracy, where the masonry units are expanded up to the half-thickness of the mortar joints, whereas the effect of mortar joints is taken into account via zero-thickness interfaces. In the case of dryjoint masonry constructions, masonry units are directly represented by discrete blocks [25,26], as illustrated in Figure 1. In this study, a simplified micromodeling approach is utilized to analyze both static and impact responses of dry-joint stone masonry arches using the discrete element method (DEM).…”
Section: Background: Discrete Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEM models have been frequently applied to tall, slender structures, from the early work on the Parthenon columns [20], to the more recent analyses of towers [21], obelisks [22], and stone minarets [23]. More complex geometries are now being addressed, such as arch bridges [24], domes [25], various types of buildings [26,27], or archaeological structures [28]. Comparisons of DEM results with the behavior observed in shaking table tests of scaled models have provided a progressive validation of its performance.…”
Section: Of 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons with tests of more complex structures have also been undertaken, namely masonry walls under out-of-plane loads [31,32], or the scaled model of a mosque [33]. DEM has been applied to many historical structures, namely the Parthenon columns [20,29], the Colosseum walls [26], a Roman temple [27], an obelisk [22], historical minarets [23], or the dome of Florence cathedral [25]. In the present study, the effect of the wall curvature on the stability of the round towers is an issue to be examined.…”
Section: Of 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigid blocks may be preferable for dynamic analysis compared to deformable blocks since the rigid block model has less computational demand [14]. In DEM, discrete bodies can be represented as circular particles or polyhedral blocks considering different scales, which depend on the type of problem [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%