2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.01015.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Reverse gear’ cellular movement mediated by chemokines

Abstract: Summary We sought to model the mechanism by which leucocytes may be actively repulsed by a β-chemokine signal. This model is used to interpret an apparent paradox in chemokine biology, whereby high levels of a T-cell chemoattractant, stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1), are present in bone marrow and thymic tissues despite a paucity of mature T lymphocytes in these areas. We postulate the differential involvement in cell migration of the two binding sites on SDF-1 for its sole receptor, CXCR4, depending on w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28,42 Different from our observation in monocytes, which almost exclusively exhibit reverse migration in response to eotaxin-3, T lymphocytes respond in a biphasic mode to the CXCR4 ligand SDF-1; although attracted by low concentrations of SDF-1, the cells get repulsed at high SDF-1 concentrations. In this system, both effects are attributed to the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and evidence for different underlying signal transduction mechanisms at low and high stimulus concentrations has been provided.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…28,42 Different from our observation in monocytes, which almost exclusively exhibit reverse migration in response to eotaxin-3, T lymphocytes respond in a biphasic mode to the CXCR4 ligand SDF-1; although attracted by low concentrations of SDF-1, the cells get repulsed at high SDF-1 concentrations. In this system, both effects are attributed to the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and evidence for different underlying signal transduction mechanisms at low and high stimulus concentrations has been provided.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…These two migratory mechanisms have been described for other chemokines and other leukocyte types (30,38,39). However, until now, in sharp contrast to the pDC response to CXCR3Ls, the chemokine-induced haptotaxis and chemorepulsion were shown to take place separately from each other and only as alternatives to also viable chemotaxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This can be paralleled to what happens in MCH neurons of the lateral hypothalamus, where SDF-1a also exerts opposite effects on the action potential discharge depending on the concentration (Guyon et al 2005b). Moreover, this can also be observed in other contexts, for example, low levels of SDF-1 (!100 ng/ml) are attractive, whereas higher levels (O1 mg/ml) are repulsive for T cells (Zlatopolskiy & Laurence 2001). Several putative mechanisms for these opposite effects, which are not mutually exclusive, are reviewed in Fig.…”
Section: Effects On Neuronal Activity and Neurotransmitter Releasementioning
confidence: 99%