“…Indeed, for any class Γ we have that Γ-CE implies Γ-FCP, because any instance of the latter can be regarded as an instance of the former by adding an empty finitary closure operator. Conversely, if Γ is Π 0 n , Π 1 n , Σ 1 n , or ∆ 1 n , then Γ-FCP is equivalent to Γ-CA 0 by Theorem 2.3 (2), and hence equivalent to Γ-CE. Thus, in particular, parts (2)-(5) of Corollary 2.5 hold for CE in place of FCP, and the full scheme CE itself is equivalent to Z 2 .…”