2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12599-010-0100-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Presentations

Abstract: Requirements engineering is frequently cited as one of the most critical stages in software development. In an offshore setting, this criticality is even increased by distance challenges. The paper presents a client-oriented method for requirements validation in offshore software development. The method aims at creating a common understanding of the future system by means of "reverse presentations". This core element of the method facilitates the transfer of knowledge across social worlds for the purpose of va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers often argue that the OSD context has higher complexity than "traditional" in-house or domestically outsourced contexts (Dibbern et al, 2008;Wiener & Stephan, 2010), making the task of controlling IS offshoring projects particularly challenging (Gopal & Gosain, 2010;Kirsch, 2004;Rustagi, King, & Kirsch, 2008). For these contexts, studies on IS project control have evolved from an early focus on antecedent conditions of control choices (e.g., Kirsch, 1996Kirsch, , 1997 to an increasing attention being placed on control outcomes (Gopal & Gosain, 2010;Tiwana, 2010;Tiwana & Keil, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers often argue that the OSD context has higher complexity than "traditional" in-house or domestically outsourced contexts (Dibbern et al, 2008;Wiener & Stephan, 2010), making the task of controlling IS offshoring projects particularly challenging (Gopal & Gosain, 2010;Kirsch, 2004;Rustagi, King, & Kirsch, 2008). For these contexts, studies on IS project control have evolved from an early focus on antecedent conditions of control choices (e.g., Kirsch, 1996Kirsch, , 1997 to an increasing attention being placed on control outcomes (Gopal & Gosain, 2010;Tiwana, 2010;Tiwana & Keil, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%