Abstract:The incidence of femoral fracture on hip prosthesis is increasing. Plate fixation is the method of choice when the prosthesis is stable. In fracture with proximal extension, the quality of the bone fixation is critical and, despite the development of anatomic plates, may be endangered when there are too few proximal screws. To resolve this issue, we recommend using a reversed LCP™ anatomic distal femoral Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS™) locking plate: e.g., a left distal femoral plate for femoral fra… Show more
“…These mechanical properties are essential in this often aged population with poor bone quality. The technique we describe has good radiological and clinical results [5][6][7], comparable with those in the literature, for both hip [19][20][21] or knee [21][22][23]. Locking plates are considered the most adapted and universal treatment [21], having less complications on TKA fractures compared with regular plates [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In daily practice, we allow total weight bearing postoperatively as often as possible in order to preserve patient autonomy and decrease bedsore complications [5][6][7]. However, our experience confirms that implant assembly must follow certain guidelines [7,9,10]:…”
Section: Osteosynthesis Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Only one model is currently used: the Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) distal femoral plate. Available in different lengths (5-23 holes), it can be used normally or inverted (a right plate for a left proximal femur) [7]. These different lengths are important, allowing stabilisation of the entire femur.…”
In our experience, under certain guidelines, this allows for immediate post-operative full weight bearing, which is beneficial to these often elderly patients.
“…These mechanical properties are essential in this often aged population with poor bone quality. The technique we describe has good radiological and clinical results [5][6][7], comparable with those in the literature, for both hip [19][20][21] or knee [21][22][23]. Locking plates are considered the most adapted and universal treatment [21], having less complications on TKA fractures compared with regular plates [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In daily practice, we allow total weight bearing postoperatively as often as possible in order to preserve patient autonomy and decrease bedsore complications [5][6][7]. However, our experience confirms that implant assembly must follow certain guidelines [7,9,10]:…”
Section: Osteosynthesis Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Only one model is currently used: the Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) distal femoral plate. Available in different lengths (5-23 holes), it can be used normally or inverted (a right plate for a left proximal femur) [7]. These different lengths are important, allowing stabilisation of the entire femur.…”
In our experience, under certain guidelines, this allows for immediate post-operative full weight bearing, which is beneficial to these often elderly patients.
“…We therefore recommend using the Distal Femoral LCP (locking compression plate) in a reversed situation: e.g., right plate for left hip. The aim is to enhance trochanteric fixation by increasing the number of proximal screws [5] .…”
“…And we can use distal femoral plate for proximal femur fracture. 2,3) In one paper, they reported the adequacy of PHILOS plates for distal medial tibial fixation or ankle arthrodesis. 4) And plating of lateral clavicle plate for medial clavicle fracture was also reported.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.