2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09841-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversed size-dependent stabilization of ordered nanophases

Abstract: The size increase of a nanoscale material is commonly associated with the increased stability of its ordered phases. Here we give a counterexample to this trend by considering the formation of the defect-free L1 1 ordered phase in AgPt nanoparticles, and showing that it is better stabilized in small nanoparticles (up to 2.5 nm) than in larger ones, in which the ordered phase breaks in multiple domains or is interrupted by faults. The driving force for the L1 1 phas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is effect becomes nonnegligible for very small nanoparticles (~2-3 nm in size) i.e. clusters [82][83][84]. The large curvature of small nanoparticles is responsible of the strain which gives a volume contribution into the excess Gibbs energy of nanoparticles.…”
Section: Phase Diagrams Of Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is effect becomes nonnegligible for very small nanoparticles (~2-3 nm in size) i.e. clusters [82][83][84]. The large curvature of small nanoparticles is responsible of the strain which gives a volume contribution into the excess Gibbs energy of nanoparticles.…”
Section: Phase Diagrams Of Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the study of growth processes in very clean environments, such as the gas phase [7], is essential to unravel the dominant pathways leading to the growth of nanoparticles of different shapes. These studies often take advantage of combined experiment-simulation efforts [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The less intense stabilization of the ordered inner-phase L1 1 with increasing the NPs size is consistent with the reversed size-dependent stabilization of the L1 1 ordering observed for AgPt NPs. 16 However, stabilization of the L1 1 ordering with respect to LEH ones for AgPt NPs (see Table 2 for values and Figure S1 for structures) was calculated to be several times stronger, 17 indicating a notably decreased propensity of AgPd NPs to form the peculiar L1 1 ordering compared to analogous AgPt NPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15 However, an intriguing counterexample to this trend has been recently demonstrated by the formation of a peculiar ordered layered phase L1 1 inside AgPt NPs smaller than 2.5 nm, whereas in larger NPs the ordering disappeared. 16 The L1 1 - phase stabilization in small NPs was associated with the formation of a monolayer-thick Ag outermost shell preventing Pt from occupying surface sites. This Ag shell has been calculated to exert increasing stress on the L1 1 layered domains with increasing particle size making the alternating −Ag–Ag– and −Pt–Pt– layers energetically unfavorable, when the NP exceeds the critical size of ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%