2016
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1022807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversibility of fouling on ultrafiltration membrane by backwashing and chemical cleaning: differences in organic fractions behaviour

Abstract: Membrane fouling is an inherent phenomenon in UF membrane processes, making it necessary to periodically perform backwashes (BW) and chemical "cleanings in place" (CIP) to restore the initial permeability of the membrane. The objective of this study was 1) to explore systematically the effect of distinct BW-related variables (BW transmembrane pressure, duration, frequency, composition) on the reversibility of UF membrane fouling and on the permeate quality (in terms of total organic carbon, turbidity and UV ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of relaxation (intermittent cessation of permeation), backwashing (reversal of permeate flow through the pores), and air backwashing with or without air scouring are common physical approaches to remove fouling in submerged systems. It has been shown in many studies that relaxation and backwashing provide an effective removal of the fouling layer, thereby prolonging the filtration process in submerged membrane systems, especially at high imposed fluxes [88,90,131,286,287]. A significant challenge in the application of relaxation and backwashing is that only partial recovery of the permeability is achieved at the end of a filtration cycle, which implies a gradual loss of the effective filtration area due to fouling.…”
Section: Techniques For Fouling Control In Dead-end Submerged Membranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of relaxation (intermittent cessation of permeation), backwashing (reversal of permeate flow through the pores), and air backwashing with or without air scouring are common physical approaches to remove fouling in submerged systems. It has been shown in many studies that relaxation and backwashing provide an effective removal of the fouling layer, thereby prolonging the filtration process in submerged membrane systems, especially at high imposed fluxes [88,90,131,286,287]. A significant challenge in the application of relaxation and backwashing is that only partial recovery of the permeability is achieved at the end of a filtration cycle, which implies a gradual loss of the effective filtration area due to fouling.…”
Section: Techniques For Fouling Control In Dead-end Submerged Membranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional CEBs based 20 on a combination of NaClO (7 mg/L) and NaOH (pH 10-11) were made every 3 BWs. The BW and CEB conditions were adopted after a previous study [31]. The total volume of feed water filtered was 4.0 L, of which approx.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be attributed to the high irreversible mass of alginate + Ca +2 compared to alginate -Ca +2 and humic acids (refer to Table 7.1). While NaOCl is known to cause swelling to hydrophobic polymeric membranes, and this assists in flushing out foulant material within the pores Zhang et al, 2017;Ferrer et al, 2016; the same cannot be said for ceramic membranes since they have solid structures and hydrophilic surfaces, thus, the swelling effect is not possible. Thus, in ceramic membrane the impact of NaOCl as a cleaning agent is reduced.…”
Section: Ceramic Uf Cleaning: Effect Of Cleaning Ph and Cleaning Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%