2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer copolymerization: influence of the RAFT process on the copolymer composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the cumulative and instantaneous mole fractions in the copolymer are about the same. This experimental fact (and subsequent analysis) is considered "best practice," and is used throughout the reactivity ratio estimation literature (see, for example, [10,[12][13][14]16,17]). …”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the cumulative and instantaneous mole fractions in the copolymer are about the same. This experimental fact (and subsequent analysis) is considered "best practice," and is used throughout the reactivity ratio estimation literature (see, for example, [10,[12][13][14]16,17]). …”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feldermann et al [138] have compared the conventional and the RAFT copolymerization for three comonomer systems, MMA-Sty, MA-Sty, and MMA-BA. In these cases, the differences between the Mayo plots, which report the copolymer composition vs. the proportion of comonomers in the initial polymerization medium, are rather weak.…”
Section: Copolymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAFT process is known to somewhat influence the (apparent) reactivity ratios of, for example, the copolymerization of methyl methacrylate and styrene though. 18 The reactivity of the monomers is not directly influenced, but differences in the rate of initiation of the monomers and during the pre-equilibrium phase can become apparent due to the typically smaller molecular weight in RAFT as compared to free-radical polymerizations, so that at very low conversion a higher reactivity can be found for one of the monomers. At the CTA concentration and conversion used for the determination of reactivity ratios in this study, such effects are likely negligible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%