1986
DOI: 10.1139/z86-246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible arrest of Artemia development by cadmium

Abstract: Under normal conditions, an encysted Artemia embryo undergoes a developmental process that culminates in the gradual, uninterrupted emergence of the prenauplius from the cyst. The hatching membrane surrounding the emerged organism is then ruptured, usually beginning at the posterior end, and a motile nauplius is released. We have observed this process microscopically in the presence and absence of cadmium and report that cadmium disrupts Artemia development in a dose–dependent manner. At 0.1 μM, cadmium slows … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in agreement with the results of Raikow et al (2006Raikow et al ( , 2007, who observed that the biocide SeaKlean had significant negative effects on hatching of D. mendotae dormant eggs, but with a ten times lower sensitivity compared to neonate mortality (Song et al 2011). Studies using dormant eggs of other zooplankton species (mainly rotifers and Artemia) gave variable results; ranging from no significant adverse effects on hatching rates (Sarabia et al 2003(Sarabia et al , 2008Varó et al 2006;Marcial and Hagiwara 2007), to effects on unhatched embryos at concentrations below effect levels for hatched individuals Rafiee et al 1986). This indicates that effects of chemicals on dormant stages differ among and within species as well as among toxicants, depending on their mode of action.…”
Section: Impact Of Pesticides On Hatching Growth and Reproductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are in agreement with the results of Raikow et al (2006Raikow et al ( , 2007, who observed that the biocide SeaKlean had significant negative effects on hatching of D. mendotae dormant eggs, but with a ten times lower sensitivity compared to neonate mortality (Song et al 2011). Studies using dormant eggs of other zooplankton species (mainly rotifers and Artemia) gave variable results; ranging from no significant adverse effects on hatching rates (Sarabia et al 2003(Sarabia et al , 2008Varó et al 2006;Marcial and Hagiwara 2007), to effects on unhatched embryos at concentrations below effect levels for hatched individuals Rafiee et al 1986). This indicates that effects of chemicals on dormant stages differ among and within species as well as among toxicants, depending on their mode of action.…”
Section: Impact Of Pesticides On Hatching Growth and Reproductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Varó et al (2006) and Sarabia et al (2003Sarabia et al ( , 2008 reported no adverse effects of metal and pesticide exposure on hatching of Artemia cysts. Bagshaw et al (1986) and Rafiee et al (1986), on the contrary, reported that hatching of dormant eggs was more sensitive to heavy metal exposure than hatched individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To quantify larval emergence and hatching ( Fig. 1) (Go et al, 1990;Rafiee et al, 1986), which served as measures of cyst development, 6 samples of 250 ml from each of three 50 ml tubes were mixed individually with 250 ml of sea water and 2 drops of Lugol's solution (Van Stappen, 1996) prior to counting with the aid of a dissecting microscope. Two drops of NaOCl [14% (technical) active chlorine] and NaOH (32% w/v) were then added to dissolve cyst shells, revealing non-hatched embryos for counting.…”
Section: Promotion Of Cyst Development By No and H 2 Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain a successful cryptobiotic state during diapause, the dormant embryos synthesize a barrier made of thick shell (hematin as major component) as well as copious amount of intracellular molecular chaperones, such as p26, HSPs, and Artemin (Clegg et al 2000;Liang and MacRae 1999;Warner et al 2004;Zhou et al 2008). Although proteins involved in the protection of embryos (pre and post-diapause conditions) are well documented, the role of maternally provided shell on the survival of dormant embryos and its role in diapause deactivation are not clearly understood (Rafiee et al 1986). Subtractive hybridization of mRNA during encystment process in A. parthenogenetica revealed the involvement of a special gene, shell gland-expressed gene (SGEG), in regulating the formation of hard shells during diapause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%