2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-006-0347-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after stenting of the carotid artery—Two case reports

Abstract: Hyperperfusion syndrome can complicate carotid revascularization, be it endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting (CAS). Although extensive effort has been devoted to reducing the incidence of ischemic stroke complicating CAS, little is known about the incidence, etiology, and prevention strategies for hyperperfusion following CAS. We report two cases (female patients 72 and 81 years) presenting severe internal carotid stenosis (> 90%), who underwent presurgical and therapeutic intervention with CAS. Both pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our opinion, the main conclusion of this communication is that BE post CR is not always a benign syndrome that tends to resolve spontaneously (as suggested by several previous reports [3][4][5][6] , but rather more a dangerous situation that can be reversible (patients 1 and 2), but also severely worsened by hemorrhage (patient 3). This fact should be strongly considered by neurologists dealing with this complication, as spontaneous resolution should not be routinely expected and strict clinical and radiologic follow-up of these patients should be maintained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our opinion, the main conclusion of this communication is that BE post CR is not always a benign syndrome that tends to resolve spontaneously (as suggested by several previous reports [3][4][5][6] , but rather more a dangerous situation that can be reversible (patients 1 and 2), but also severely worsened by hemorrhage (patient 3). This fact should be strongly considered by neurologists dealing with this complication, as spontaneous resolution should not be routinely expected and strict clinical and radiologic follow-up of these patients should be maintained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It includes unilateral headache, seizures, cerebral hemorrhage, and symptomatic brain edema (BE) [1][2][3][4][5][6] . BE is an uncommon presentation of HS and has been related to the production of vasogenic edema, and speculated to have a benign course with spontaneous resolution of the neurologic deficits and radiologic findings [3][4][5][6] . Its mechanism has been studied by magnetic resonance 5 and linked to hypertensive encephalopathy and other related reversible conditions 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,31,33,35,40,43,45,50 Carotid artery angioplasty with stent placement has been proposed as an alternative technique for revascularization in cases of ICA stenosis. 38 Although there have been multiple reports of CHS following CAS, 1,2,6,11,12,18,[21][22][23][24]34,37 study populations have been too small for the proper characterization of clinical attributes. Moreover, it is unclear whether there are differences in clinical features when comparing those who experience postoperative CHS after CAS versus those who have the condition following CEA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have analyzed the characteristics of this ICH when it appears in the first few hours and without prodromes, attributing it to the rupture of deep penetrating arteries as a result of the sudden normalization of the pressure of cerebral perfusion after angioplasty, similar to what occurs in hemorrhage due to hypertension (Buhk et al, 2006;Coutts et al, 2003). Many cases of SAH after CAS have been reported (Abou-Chebl et al, 2004;Coutts et al, 2003;Hartmann et al, 2004;Ho et al, 2000;McCabe et al, 1999;Meyers et al, 2000;Morrish et al, 2000;Nikolsky et al, 2002;Pilz et al, 2006;Qureshi et al, 2002); these have a better prognosis than ICH. It is logical to assume that CBF increases substantially after CAS in a severely stenosed carotid artery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%