1997
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-33.3.611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Immobilization of Free-Ranging Polar Bears With Medetomidine-Zolazepam-Tiletamine and Atipamezole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Some drug combinations have proven unreliable in bears, including xylazine-ketamine and medetomidine-ketamine, due to the risk of sudden arousal with few predictable signs of recovery in response to loud noises, potential movement of the bear, painful stimuli, and vocalizations of cubs for sows. 8,9 For the past 10-15 years, tiletamine-zolazepam (Zoletil, Telazol) have become the drug of choice for immobilizing free-ranging bears, because this combination results in a relatively short induction time (generally Ͻ10 min), 6 reliable and predictable immobilization, minimal adverse effects on cardiopulmonary system, and safety in handling for operators. The disadvantages of tiletamine-zolazepam include the lack of analgesia for potentially painful procedures; the lack of antagonist drugs for tiletamine; and a lengthy recovery period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Some drug combinations have proven unreliable in bears, including xylazine-ketamine and medetomidine-ketamine, due to the risk of sudden arousal with few predictable signs of recovery in response to loud noises, potential movement of the bear, painful stimuli, and vocalizations of cubs for sows. 8,9 For the past 10-15 years, tiletamine-zolazepam (Zoletil, Telazol) have become the drug of choice for immobilizing free-ranging bears, because this combination results in a relatively short induction time (generally Ͻ10 min), 6 reliable and predictable immobilization, minimal adverse effects on cardiopulmonary system, and safety in handling for operators. The disadvantages of tiletamine-zolazepam include the lack of analgesia for potentially painful procedures; the lack of antagonist drugs for tiletamine; and a lengthy recovery period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the brown bear (Ursus arctos), tiletamine-zolazepam 3,8 and xylazine and tiletamine-zolazepam 8 have been commonly used. For polar bears (Ursus maretimus), tiletamine-zolazepam, 4,5,11,20,21 medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam, 6 xylazine and tiletaminezolazepam, 5 and xylazine and ketamine 15,19 have been used. For the Hokkaido brown bear (Ursus arctos yesoensis), tiletamine-zolazepam and midazolam-ketamine are commonly utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), the most common of which typically include a dissociative and a tranquilizer (e.g., zolazepam and tiletamine, ketamine and xylazine or medetomidine; Addison and Kolenosky, 1979;Bush and Custer, 1980;Gibeau and Paquet, 1991;White et al, 1996;Cattet et al, 1997;Caulkett and Cattet, 2002;Kreeger et al, 2002). TelazolH (Fort Dodge, Fort Dodge, Iowa, USA), a formulated combination of tiletamine and zolazepam, is used extensively in wildlife medicine and management due to its wide margin of safety, its broad spectrum of species efficacy and its lyophilized form that allows for reconstitution at variable concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, etorphine [1,11], ketamine-xylazine [7,13], and medetomidine-ketamine [3,5] have been used to immobilize bears. Recently a mixture of tiletaminezolazepam has often been used as an anesthetic drug administered alone for brown bear (Ursus arctos) [12,14] and polar bear (U. maritimus) [3,6,9,10] or administered with a combination of medetomidine for polar bear [2,3,5], black bear (U. americanus) [4] and sun bear (Helarctos malayanus) [8]. In this study, we first applied tiletaminezolazepam to Japanese black bear (U. thibetanus japonicus) to evaluate the anesthetic effect and its safety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the only problem is that the effects of TZ can not be reversed because no specific antagonist drug for TZ is available. Recently, medetomidine-tiletaminezolazepam combinations (MTZ) have been used for handling of bears, and the use of atipamezole, the antagonist against medetomidine, reduced recovery times in bears [2][3][4][5]8]. There are many situations that the effects of TZ in bears should be reversed immediately, as when handling unhealthy bears and relocating those with aversive conditioning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%