1965
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)96994-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Inactivation and Dissociation of Yeast Hexokinase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of activity is the fastest, but this may simply reflect an effect of the added substrates which, as detailed above, conspicuously increases the degree of association of the monomers. Kenkare and Colowick (1965) reported that oxidation of SH groups prevented the reassociation of hexokinase, but we were able to exclude this possibility because recovery was unaffected by the addition of 0.04 M ß-mercaptoethanol to the solutions.…”
Section: Results and Their Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of activity is the fastest, but this may simply reflect an effect of the added substrates which, as detailed above, conspicuously increases the degree of association of the monomers. Kenkare and Colowick (1965) reported that oxidation of SH groups prevented the reassociation of hexokinase, but we were able to exclude this possibility because recovery was unaffected by the addition of 0.04 M ß-mercaptoethanol to the solutions.…”
Section: Results and Their Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A similar stabilization was observed when Na2SG4 was substituted by (NH4)2SG4. Colowick and co-workers (Kenkare & Colowick, 1965; Schulze & Colowick, 1969) concluded from a study of the acid denaturation of hexokinase and the modification of hexokinase by proteases in phosphate buffers that the salts promoted the dissociation of the dimer. We note that this conclusion, and a similar one about glucose, was derived not from direct measurements of the free energy of dissociation but indirectly through the use of kinetic methods, under the assumption that the rate-determining step of the observed reaction was the actual dissociation of the enzyme.…”
Section: Results and Their Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This binding technique appears to be a useful and precise way to determine the purity of hexokinase preparations, although the combining weights given above are only approximate as they are based on the manufacturer's stated concentrations and activities for the enzyme preparations used. The molecular weight of hexokinase has been reported to be 46,000 at pH 7 by Kenkare and Colowick (1965), and to vary from 42,000 to 48,000 by pH 7.6, depending on concentration, by Rudolph and Fromm (1970). It thus appears likely that one CrATP and one glucose combine per molecule of this size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sucrose gradients (5-20 %, w/v) contained 0.05 m Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The markers used were bovine serum albumin (molecular weight 67,000, j20 = 4.4 S; Hughes and Dintzis, 1964), hexokinase (molecular weight 95,000, s2 = 5.5 S; Kenkare and Colowick, 1965), rabbit muscle glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (molecular weight 145,000, s2o = 7.3 S; Allison and Kaplan, 1964), -globulins (molecular weight 160,000, J20 = 7.1 S; Putnam, 1965), and catalase (molecular weight 250,000, s20 = 11.4 S; Martin and Ames, 1961). The sedimentation was followed by elution of the fractions with a special device that included continuous ultraviolet control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%