2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00921.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Phosphorylation as a Molecular Switch to Regulate Plasma Membrane Targeting of Acylated SH4 Domain Proteins

Abstract: Acylated SH4 domains represent N-terminal targeting signals that anchor peripheral membrane proteins such as Src kinases in the inner leaflet of plasma membranes.Here we provide evidence for a novel regulatory mechanism that may control the levels of SH4 proteins being associated with plasma membranes. Using a fusion protein of the SH4 domain of Leishmania HASPB and GFP as a model system, we demonstrate that threonine 6 is a substrate for phosphorylation. Substitution of threonine 6 by glutamate (to mimic a ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2A, indicated by white arrow). Consistent with previous findings (54), H(C5A)-and H(T6E)-Nef⌬SH4.GFP localized to intracellular compartments but also diffusely to the cytoplasm, as well as faintly to the PM (category 4, light gray bars in Fig. 2C).…”
Section: Chimeric Nefgfp Proteins Differ In Subcellular Localizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2A, indicated by white arrow). Consistent with previous findings (54), H(C5A)-and H(T6E)-Nef⌬SH4.GFP localized to intracellular compartments but also diffusely to the cytoplasm, as well as faintly to the PM (category 4, light gray bars in Fig. 2C).…”
Section: Chimeric Nefgfp Proteins Differ In Subcellular Localizationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4B) and did not reach its steady state distribution within the 3.5-h observation period, suggesting that in this case heterologous targeting routed Nef.GFP to a distinct anterograde transport pathway. Expectedly, the C5A and T6E Haspb SH4 domain mutants also mediated initial targeting to perinuclear membranes (54). However, these constructs accumulated in the cytoplasm and were not abundantly detected at the PM within the time frame of observation.…”
Section: Chimeric Nefgfp Proteins Differ In Subcellular Localizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These contained the N-terminal 18 amino acids of either Leishmania HASPB (Denny et al 2000;Stegmayer et al 2005) or of the mammalian SRC kinase YES1 (Tournaviti et al 2009) fused to GFP (SH4-HASPB-GFP) and mCherry (SH4-YES1-mCherry), respectively. Both fusion proteins are substrates for N-terminal myristoylation and subsequent palmitoylation (cysteine 5 in HASPB; cysteine 3 in YES1) (Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N-terminal SH4 domains are sufficient for intracellular targeting of, for example, GFP fusion proteins to the inner leaflet of plasma membranes (McCabe and Berthiaume 1999;Denny et al 2000;McCabe and Berthiaume 2001;Stegmayer et al 2005;Tournaviti et al 2007Tournaviti et al , 2009). Myristoylation of SH4 domains occurs cotranslationally and results in a transient insertion into intracellular membranes in a perinuclear region where they colocalize with Golgi markers (Wolven et al 1997;Denny et al 2000;Stegmayer et al 2005;Tournaviti et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%