2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500507102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible self-assembly and directed assembly of DNA-linked micrometer-sized colloids

Abstract: We present a technique for the directed assembly and self-assembly of micrometer-scale structures based on the control of specific DNA linkages between colloidal particles. The use of DNA links combined with polymer brushes provides an effective way to regulate the range and magnitude of addressable forces between pairs (and further combinations) of different particles. We demonstrate that the autoassembly of alternate microbeads as well as their directed assembly, by using laser tweezers, is reversible. The k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
268
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
268
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also established that studies of systems where DNA bonds are formed via transient interactions between small sticky ends at the tip of primarily rigid DNA duplexes not only enable more complex superlattice design, but also facilitate fundamental investigations of their crystallization behavior. We therefore encourage both the experimental and theoretical scientific communities to further examine the behavior of these PAEs using techniques that have been previously applied to systems using long DNA overlaps between particles, or primarily singlestranded DNA linkers (9,10,12,21,22,26). Lastly, this work underscores the notion that PAEs present a highly programmable means of studying and controlling crystallization in a more facile and directable manner than their atomic counterparts, and thus are a useful tool for materials synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also established that studies of systems where DNA bonds are formed via transient interactions between small sticky ends at the tip of primarily rigid DNA duplexes not only enable more complex superlattice design, but also facilitate fundamental investigations of their crystallization behavior. We therefore encourage both the experimental and theoretical scientific communities to further examine the behavior of these PAEs using techniques that have been previously applied to systems using long DNA overlaps between particles, or primarily singlestranded DNA linkers (9,10,12,21,22,26). Lastly, this work underscores the notion that PAEs present a highly programmable means of studying and controlling crystallization in a more facile and directable manner than their atomic counterparts, and thus are a useful tool for materials synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In these systems, however, the identity of the atom and its bonding behavior cannot be independently controlled, limiting our ability to tune material properties at will. In contrast, when a nanoparticle is modified with a dense shell of upright, oriented DNA, it can behave as a programmable atom equivalent (PAE) (1, 2) that can be used to synthesize diverse crystal structures with independent control over composition, scale, and lattice symmetry (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The thermodynamic product of this crystallization process has been extensively studied by both experimental and theoretical means, and thus a series of design rules has been proposed and validated with a simple geometric model known as the complementary contact model (CCM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use has also been made of different particles, A and B, functionalized with cDNA strands (13). This configuration, where A-A and B-B bonds do not occur but A-B bonds do (14)(15)(16), has been exploited to form more complex crystals, such as BCC or CsCl structures (12,17). Over the past several years, there has been a great deal of progress in modeling the DNA-mediated interparticle interaction and making quantitative comparisons with experiments (16,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Multifunctional | Thermodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have reported interaction models (9,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), all based on capturing the entropic contributions and hybridization thermodynamics of individual grafted DNA molecules. While these models qualitatively describe the existing interaction measurements based on the temperature-dependent aggregation-disaggregation transition of DNA-labeled nanoparticles (16), microparticles (12,14,(17)(18)(19), and polymers (20), or direct measurements with optical tweezers (9), they typically overpredict the interaction strength by roughly two orders of magnitude, corresponding to an unexpectedly large hybridization free energy difference of ∼5 k B T per DNA bridge. Moreover, while the models predict that the interaction strength varies exponentially with temperature, they overestimate the steepness of the temperature dependence by roughly a factor of two.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%