2021
DOI: 10.1111/nph.17133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversing extinction trends: new uses of (old) herbarium specimens to accelerate conservation action on threatened species

Abstract: Summary Although often not collected specifically for the purposes of conservation, herbarium specimens offer sufficient information to reconstruct parameters that are needed to designate a species as ‘at‐risk’ of extinction. While such designations should prompt quick and efficient legal action towards species recovery, such action often lags far behind and is mired in bureaucratic procedure. The increase in online digitization of natural history collections has now led to a surge in the number new studies on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
49
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 240 publications
0
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Growing recognition of the imperative to accelerate extinction risk assessments (Albani Rocchetti et al, 2020;Bachman et al, 2019), advances in digitisation of natural history collections (Paton et al, 2020), and widening availability of biodiversity data have stimulated development of AA methods. Early examples of method development focused on relatively small groups: Krupnick et al (2009) calibrated a rule-based method on 1,192 Hawaiian plants, Bland et al (2015) compared how different machine learning algorithms predicted the conservation status of 637 terrestrial mammals, and Darrah et al (2017) explored the use of coarse-scale distribution data to predict conservation status for 6,439 bulbous monocots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing recognition of the imperative to accelerate extinction risk assessments (Albani Rocchetti et al, 2020;Bachman et al, 2019), advances in digitisation of natural history collections (Paton et al, 2020), and widening availability of biodiversity data have stimulated development of AA methods. Early examples of method development focused on relatively small groups: Krupnick et al (2009) calibrated a rule-based method on 1,192 Hawaiian plants, Bland et al (2015) compared how different machine learning algorithms predicted the conservation status of 637 terrestrial mammals, and Darrah et al (2017) explored the use of coarse-scale distribution data to predict conservation status for 6,439 bulbous monocots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid loss of biodiversity represents a wicked problem in conservation and demands innovative ways to quickly document populations of rare taxa and areas with high conservation value to provide protection before populations are lost and taxa become extinct [1]. Biodiversity is being lost before it is described [2], and an estimated 39% of plant taxa alone are at risk of extinction [3], with only 10% of all plant taxa assessed using the IUCN Red List guidelines [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compilation of biodiversity data supports conservation action to address the problem of rapid biodiversity loss, and both historic and current biodiversity records provide valuable spatial and temporal information to those applying resources to land acquisition, conservation planning, ecological restoration, environmental review/regulation, and other on-the-ground conservation actions [1]. Specifically, biodiversity data guide the application of conservation resources (funding, labor, and education/outreach efforts) toward the highest priority sites, species, and ecosystems [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are plenty publications providing guidance for resistant taxa selection by studying either morphological or physiological traits in experimental researches ( Ji et al., 2020 ; Ma and Fan, 2014 ). However, the number of experimental taxa is often restricted by the time-consuming fieldwork, compounded by the possibility that practitioners would be interested in just a small proportion of the resources ( Albani Rocchetti et al., 2021 ; Watkins et al, 2020 ). With ever-improving digital technologies enhancing our ability to access information, using digitized collections data to predict the abiotic stress tolerance of plants is an alternative strategy to complement the experimental resource lists ( James et al., 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%