2018
DOI: 10.1093/forsci/fxy053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversing Mesophication Effects on Understory Woody Vegetation in Mid-Southern Oak Forests

Abstract: Mesophication has reduced fuel-bed flammability in the Mid-Southern US, limiting the effectiveness of fire alone in promoting disturbance-adapted woody species. We applied combinations of thinning (none, 7, and 14 m 2 ha -1 residual basal area) and seasonal fire (none, October, and March) at three sites and monitored understory woody response from 2008 to 2016. In combination, thinning and burning had strong negative effects on some mesophytic species (Pinus strobus, Ostrya virginiana, and Fagus grandifolia) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…woodlands at Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee (AAFB; Stambaugh et al 2016) and, to the south, two records of historically very frequent fire exist from montane longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) in the Appalachian Mountains at Choccolocco Mountain (CHO) and Brymer Mountain (BRY) (Stambaugh et al 2017) for sustainable management (regeneration, growth, and disturbance histories; Hutchinson et al 2019), and measured responses to specific silvicultural and fire treatments (Harley et al 2018;Vander Yacht et al 2018). Currently, only one historical record documenting growth and fire history in a remnant shortleaf pine stand exists at the northern edge of the Cumberland Plateau (Hutchinson et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…woodlands at Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee (AAFB; Stambaugh et al 2016) and, to the south, two records of historically very frequent fire exist from montane longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) in the Appalachian Mountains at Choccolocco Mountain (CHO) and Brymer Mountain (BRY) (Stambaugh et al 2017) for sustainable management (regeneration, growth, and disturbance histories; Hutchinson et al 2019), and measured responses to specific silvicultural and fire treatments (Harley et al 2018;Vander Yacht et al 2018). Currently, only one historical record documenting growth and fire history in a remnant shortleaf pine stand exists at the northern edge of the Cumberland Plateau (Hutchinson et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clabo and Clatterbuck () noted similar but variable patterns in fire residence times across seasons. Fire season effects were not obvious in this study, but potential advantages of growing‐season fire in reducing hardwood competition (Vander Yacht et al, , ) without negatively affecting the herbaceous layers of shortleaf‐bluestem communities (Sparks, Masters, Engle, Palmer, & Bukenhofer, ) deserves greater research attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Thresholds are more useful when they more comprehensively capture restoration goals. In temperate climates, woodlands and savannas are often restored from degraded remnants that lack herbaceous layers (Vander Yacht et al, ) and fire‐tolerant woody regeneration capable of sustaining overstorey structure (Vander Yacht et al, ). Simultaneously promoting woody and herbaceous components is challenging given strong competitive and inhibitory effects between the two functional groups (Dohn et al, ; Mayer & Khalyani, ; Scholes & Archer, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire behavior also changed within a short time frame (e.g., the mean RoS of P. halepensis) in treatment "60" was only 34.9% of the value obtained in treatment "0", calculation based on Table S3). Even though these effects cannot be attributed solely to fuel bed compaction, seasonal differences in the BD of leaf litter layer (L-layer) (e.g., [41]) and fire behavior were also measured in forest stands (e.g., [56,57]).…”
Section: Importance Of the Observed Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%