1970
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-61-2-233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversion of Bacillus subtilis Protoplasts to the Bacillary Form Induced by Exogenous Cell Wall, Bacteria and by Growth in Membrane Filters

Abstract: S U M M A R YMethods were developed for growing protoplasts or L bodies of Bacillus subtilis into L colonies on membrane filters. Only some types of filters permitted growth; for optimum growth the filters usually had to be extracted with 2 % (v/v) ethanol in water. Scoring was greatly improved by staining.Growth on the filters induced reversion of the protoplasts to the bacillary form. Reversion was greatly enhanced when B. subtilis wall was added to the filter. A lesser enhancement occurred when wall was add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N16-5 could not regenerate the cell wall on the modified DM3 medium, which could support the successful protoplast regeneration and transformation of alkaliphilic Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4 and Bacillus halodurans C-125 [10], [12]. According to the previous report, protoplast reversion of Bacillus subtilis was stimulated by the close physical contact between the naked protoplasts and the hard substratum provided by the regeneration medium with 25% gelatin, hard agar or membrane filters [31], [35]. So succinate medium solidified with 25% gelatin (SG25 medium), a hard gelatin regeneration medium, was used to stimulate the protoplast regeneration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N16-5 could not regenerate the cell wall on the modified DM3 medium, which could support the successful protoplast regeneration and transformation of alkaliphilic Bacillus pseudofirmus OF4 and Bacillus halodurans C-125 [10], [12]. According to the previous report, protoplast reversion of Bacillus subtilis was stimulated by the close physical contact between the naked protoplasts and the hard substratum provided by the regeneration medium with 25% gelatin, hard agar or membrane filters [31], [35]. So succinate medium solidified with 25% gelatin (SG25 medium), a hard gelatin regeneration medium, was used to stimulate the protoplast regeneration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For reversion of the protoplast to the bacillary form, several modifications of SA1.2 medium had been examined, including addition of autoclaved Bacillus sp. N16-5 cells [31], substitution of bovine serum albumin (BSA) by maize starch or skim milk [32], replacement of sodium succinate by sucrose [33] or mannitol [34], addition of 2.5% gelatin [34], removal of BSA, and lowering the incubation temperature from 37°C to 25°C. However, neither L colonies nor bacillary colonies arose when sucrose or mannitol was used as the osmotic stabilizer and BSA was substituted by skim milk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier publications, it was reported that reversion occurred efficiently when the protoplasts were immobilized in special solid media, namely, 25% gelatin medium at 26°C and 2 or 2.5% agar (4,13,16,17). Reversion was stimulated by membrane filters and by various autoclaved bacteria and yeast (3). It was concluded that a physically solid surface was an important factor in the induction of reversion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following media were previously described: SS medium, a solid 0.5 M succinate-containing medium for the efficient growth of L colonies by the spread plate method, was modified from an earlier version (9) by substituting Baltimore Biological Laboratories gelatin for purified pigskin gelatin. Osmotically stabilized enriched (liquid) minimal medium (SP3S) was the same as described previously (6), except that the only amino acid supplement added was L-tryptophan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%