Review: Adverse event monitoring and reporting in studies of pediatric psychosocial interventions: a systematic review

Lodewyk, Kalee; Bagnell, Alexa; Courtney, Darren; Newton, Amanda S

doi:10.1111/camh.12661

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 150 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…suicide, suicide attempts, mental health related hospital admissions)[ 62 ]. A systematic review by Lodewyk et al [ 63 ] summarized the AEs caused by psychological interventions, and they identified that AEs were of the following types, physical, cognitive and/or mental health, social and/or academic, and health care usage, and the most common event monitored was hospitalization[ 63 ]. AEs of psychological interventions were mainly, caused by ineffective engagement, ineffective practice, and accidental events[ 64 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological interventions for depression in children and adolescents: A bibliometric analysis

Wang,

Kong,

Bai

et al. 2024

World J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Depression has gradually become a common psychological disorder among children and adolescents. Depression in children and adolescents affects their physical and mental development. Psychotherapy is considered to be one of the main treatment options for depressed children and adolescents. However, our understanding of the global performance and progress of psychological interventions for depression in children and adolescents (PIDCA) research is limited. AIM To identify collaborative research networks in this field and explore the current research status and hotspots through bibliometrics. METHODS Articles and reviews related to PIDCA from January 2010 to April 2023 were identified from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The Charticulator website, CiteSpace and VOSviewer software were used to visualize the trends in publications and citations, the collaborative research networks (countries, institutions, and authors), and the current research status and hotspots. RESULTS Until April 16, 2023, 1482 publications were identified. The number of documents published each year and citations had increased rapidly in this field. The United States had the highest productivity in this field. The most prolific institution was the University of London. Pim Cuijpers was the most prolific author. In the context of research related to PIDCA, both reference co-citation analysis and keywords co-occurrence analysis identified 10 research hotspots, including third-wave cognitive behavior therapy, short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy, family element in psychotherapy, modular treatment, mobile-health, emotion-regulation-based transdiagnostic intervention program, dementia risk in later life, predictors of the efficacy of psychological intervention, and risks of psychological intervention. CONCLUSION This bibliometric study provides a comprehensive overview of PIDCA from 2010 to present. Psychological intervention characterized as psychological-process-focused, short, family-involved, modular, internet-based, emotion-regulation-based, and personalized may benefit more young people.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological interventions for depression in children and adolescents: A bibliometric analysis

Wang,

Kong,

Bai

et al. 2024

World J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis: The Efficacy of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Sleep Disturbances in Children and Adolescents

Hornsey,

Gosling,

Jurek

et al. 2024

Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Unwanted or negative treatment reactions in digital psychological interventions for adolescents with chronic pain

de la Vega,

Yokoyama,

Daniels

et al. 2024

Journal of Pediatric Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Reports of pain clinical trials evaluating psychological treatments often lack sufficient details on the potential and actual harm resulting from intervention. We aimed to understand how frequent and intense treatment reactions, conceptualized as unwanted symptoms, were in three clinical trials of digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for adolescents with: (1) chronic primary pain, (2) sickle cell disease, and (3) chronic pancreatitis. We also aimed to understand any differences by demographic and clinical variables. Method Analyses were conducted with 246 youths (12–18 years old) experiencing chronic pain and one of their caregivers. 66% of the total sample was female. The number, intensity, and type of treatment reactions experienced were assessed post treatment. T-tests and Chi-squared tests were conducted to explore whether certain treatment reactions were more frequent as a function of baseline or clinical characteristics. Results 9% of participants experienced some negative treatment reaction. The average intensity of those events was very low on a 0–3 scale (M = 0.1, SD = 0.4). There were no differences in the prevalence or intensity as a function of participant’s sex, age, race, or baseline pain intensity. However, baseline anxiety [t = −2.4 (244); p < .05] and baseline pain interference [t = −2.2 (223); p < .05] were significantly higher in those who experienced negative treatment reactions. Conclusions A small number of participants reported experiencing negative treatment reactions, with a low intensity level. Those experiencing negative treatment reactions showed higher baseline anxiety and pain interference. Future research may build from our example to standardize collection of harms data in trials of psychological interventions.

show abstract

Review: Adverse event monitoring and reporting in studies of pediatric psychosocial interventions: a systematic review

Cited by 6 publications

References 150 publications

Psychological interventions for depression in children and adolescents: A bibliometric analysis

Psychological interventions for depression in children and adolescents: A bibliometric analysis

Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis: The Efficacy of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Sleep Disturbances in Children and Adolescents

Unwanted or negative treatment reactions in digital psychological interventions for adolescents with chronic pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About